The Propaganda for Reform in Proprietary Medicines, Vol. 1 of 2 — John Shaqi
The Propaganda for Reform in Proprietary Medicines, Vol. 1 of 2Council on Pharmacy and Chemistry (American Medical Association)
Science
The Propaganda for Reform in Proprietary Medicines, Vol. 1 of 2
Council on Pharmacy and Chemistry (American Medical Association)
Patent medicines
“Teaspoonful doses after meals and upon retiring have proven
efficacious [in “dyspepsia”] when other remedies have failed.”
Here is a good example of proprietary-house therapeutics: Such widely
different conditions as digestive trouble and the climacteric are to be
treated with a combination of alcohol, simple bitters and aromatics!
Why not order a cocktail under its own name? It would be equally
efficacious, less mysterious and its dangers might be better realized!
“A teaspoonful or two in three tablespoonfuls of boiling hot water
[for insomnia] upon retiring.”
Any other hot toddy at bedtime (and it need not cost a dollar a bottle)
might give relief; but the intelligent physician to-day recognizes the
danger of prescribing alcohol in such conditions.
“In the case of brain workers who suffer from nervous excitability
and mental fatigue, the administration of Celerina in teaspoonful
doses, three times a day and at bedtime, rapidly controls the
condition and increases mental capacity.”
And the same effect follows its use:
“In cases involving worry, anxiety, overwork, and excesses of
various kinds....”
Moreover:
“Celerina is the most prompt and efficient of remedies for
devitalized or broken-down constitutions--doses four times a day.”
The statement made by its manufacturers that this preparation is free
from narcotics or habit-forming drugs is not true. Alcohol is both a
narcotic and a habit-forming drug.
As in the case of other nostrums containing no potent drugs but
alcohol, Celerina is recommended for various diseased conditions in
combination with a familiar form of treatment by drugs of more or
less value. The physician who thoughtlessly prescribes one of these
combinations will without doubt unthinkingly attribute any subsequent
improvement to the Celerina. Thus, for malaria, a prescription of
quinin and Celerina is advised; for chorea in children, arsenic with
Celerina; in “Convalescence from La Grippe,” strychnin sulphate,
Fowler’s solution, and Celerina; for impotence, nux vomica, dilute
phosphoric acid and Celerina. In none of these conditions would
Celerina affect favorably anything except the pockets of the
exploiters; in some, as in the chorea of children, the alcohol would
be positively detrimental. Of course, the value of such prescriptions
(so far as they have any apart from the fictitious value lent by the
alcohol) resides altogether in the standard drugs prescribed with
Celerina.
There is no possible excuse for writing a prescription for Celerina,
either in original package or mixed with well-known or valuable drugs.
The sooner it is realized that this preparation has no place in
medicine, should never be prescribed by physicians and is essentially
nothing but alcohol and bitters exploited under a fancy name, the
better for the public health and the science of medicine. The continued
sale and use of Celerina is a disgrace to the medical profession.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account