The Propaganda for Reform in Proprietary Medicines, Vol. 2 of 2Council on Pharmacy and Chemistry (American Medical Association)
Science
The Propaganda for Reform in Proprietary Medicines, Vol. 2 of 2
Council on Pharmacy and Chemistry (American Medical Association)
Patent medicines
First, the cause of common colds is, at the present time, quite
unknown. One of the most striking things is that at the beginning of
a cold the organisms to be cultivated from the nasal mucous membrane
are very few in number and there is no uniformity in the type of
organism found. If someone of the well-known organisms (Streptococcus,
Staphylococcus, Pneumococcus, Micrococcus Catarrhalis, Influenza
Bacillus, etc.) were responsible, we should expect to find one of them
preponderating and in overwhelming numbers. This is far from the case.
After the duration of the cold for a day or two with the increased
production of mucus and apparently with the infection of a mucous
membrane whose powers of resistance have been greatly lowered, bacteria
of all kinds are to be found in immense numbers. There is considerable
reason for believing that an ultramicroscopic organism is responsible
for this condition (See Foster, _Journal of Infectious Diseases_
=21=:451 [Nov.] 1917).
Second, there is no acceptable clinical evidence that vaccination with
the influenza bacillus, the Streptococcus, the Pneumococcus or the
Micrococcus Catarrhalis will influence the course of an infection due
to one or the other of these organisms. It has been repeatedly found
that a staphylococcus vaccine is of a certain degree of value when the
infection with the staphylococcus is localized, but it is well known
that general systemic infections with the staphylococcus are not at all
benefited.
Third, the letter submitted as evidence by the Mulford Company is not
convincing. The Council is not prepared to accept evidence of this sort
unless it is in volume large enough to justify a definite conclusion.
Holding that there is no evidence for the value of this mixture, the
Council declared “Influenza Serobacterin Mixed-Mulford” inadmissible to
New and Nonofficial Remedies because its use is illogical.
Sherman’s Mixed Vaccine No. 40
Because of inquiry received the Council decided to consider this
preparation and requested the manufacturer, G. H. Sherman, Detroit,
Mich., to submit evidence in support of the claims made for it.
This vaccine is said to be made from killed cultures of Streptococcus,
Pneumococcus, Micrococcus catarrhalis, Staphylococcus aureus, and
Staphylococcus albus. In the printed matter sent out by G. H. Sherman
this vaccine is recommended for hay-fever, in which it is stated that
some of the symptoms are due to bacterial invasion of the respiratory
mucosa; for tonsillitis, both as a remedy and as a prophylactic against
rheumatic and other sequelae; for “throat infections”; for rhinitis
with the claims that acute coryza can be aborted within twenty-four
hours; for pneumonia in which it is advised for all stages; for
laryngitis, for bronchitis, and for asthma.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account