The Propaganda for Reform in Proprietary Medicines, Vol. 2 of 2Council on Pharmacy and Chemistry (American Medical Association)
Science
The Propaganda for Reform in Proprietary Medicines, Vol. 2 of 2
Council on Pharmacy and Chemistry (American Medical Association)
Patent medicines
No acceptable evidence was submitted as to the value of the product in
the treatment of any of the foregoing conditions. In view of what is
known about non-specific reactions, it seems likely that any influence
which this vaccine may have on the diverse conditions enumerated by
the manufacturer, is due to this, rather than to the combination of
organisms used in its preparation.
On the recommendation of the Committee on Serums and Vaccines, the
Council declared “Sherman’s Mixed Vaccine No. 40” ineligible to New
and Nonofficial Remedies because the therapeutic claims made for it
are unwarranted (Rule 6) and because the combination, in view of
its complexity, is irrational and detrimental to sound therapy (Rule
10).--(_From The Journal A. M. A., June 23, 1918._)
OPHTHALMOL-LINDEMANN
Report of the Council on Pharmacy and Chemistry
Ophthalmol-Lindemann was taken up for consideration by the Council
because of inquiries received. The following report, declaring
Ophthalmol inadmissible to New and Nonofficial Remedies, was adopted by
the Council and its publication authorized.
W. A. Puckner, Secretary.
Ophthalmol-Lindemann (Innis, Speiden and Co., New York) is advertised
as a treatment for eye diseases by “hyperemia.” The circular
advertising the product is written somewhat in the style of “patent
medicine” advertisements. It contains testimonials of dubious value.
The principle underlying the use of Ophthalmol is that employed
to a considerable extent by ophthalmologists, through the use of
ethylmorphine (“dionin”), etc., viz., the production of conjunctival
irritation in inflammatory eye diseases. Ophthalmol is, therefore,
merely a special agent for the production of such ophthalmic irritation.
The advertising circular contains no evidence that Ophthalmol is in any
respect superior to the established agents for producing conjunctival
hyperemia. On the other hand, there are obvious objections to the
use in the eye of a substance of unknown and apparently indefinite
composition and uncertain activity. Ophthalmol is said to be an oily
solution of “glandular extract of the fish Cobitis Fossilis.” _Cobitis
fossilis_ is a small fish said to be common in Germany. According to
Kochs, who analyzed Ophthalmol (_Arb. a. d. Pharm. Inst. d. Univ.
Berl._, =4=:140, 1907), this fish is popularly believed to predict
weather, but medical virtues are not ascribed to it. This “fishy”
extract is indefinite, to say the least.
The activity of the preparation is described by the manufacturer thus:
“It seems probable that the typical action of Ophthalmol is due to
certain organic acids which may have formed during manufacture through
the decomposition of protein bodies contained in the crude material.”
The profession is not told whether this important decomposition is,
or, in fact, can be controlled so as to produce a material of uniform
activity.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account