The quarterly of the Oregon Historical Society, Vol. 1, No. 3, September, 1900Oregon Historical Society
History
The quarterly of the Oregon Historical Society, Vol. 1, No. 3, September, 1900
Oregon Historical Society
Oregon -- History -- Periodicals
GEORGE H. HIMES,
CITY HALL, PORTLAND, OREGON. _Assistant Secretary_.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
VOLUME I] SEPTEMBER, 1900 [NUMBER 3
THE QUARTERLY
OF THE
OREGON HISTORICAL SOCIETY.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
THE OREGON QUESTION.
II.
The conventions of 1824 and 1825 marked the formal and final withdrawal
of Russia as claimant to the sovereignty of the Oregon country, or of
any part of it. The convention of the former year pledged her withdrawal
as claimant against the United States, that of the latter year as
claimant against Great Britain. The boundaries of the territories in
question were thus finally determined, and the parties to the dispute
were reduced to the two nations by whom the question at issue was
ultimately to be decided.
It was a great step taken toward settlement when the claims of all
nations but Great Britain and the United States were eliminated from the
question. But elimination of claims was not the only respect in which
progress towards settlement had been made during the period which closed
with the convention between Great Britain and Russia. The ten years
between the treaty of Ghent and this convention show a substantial
approach to agreement between Great Britain and America. The events of
the year 1818 in particular mark this approach. This year, so important
in the history of the relations between Great Britain and America,
opened with the issue of the order of January 26 by the British
government for the restitution of Fort George, the post at the mouth of
the Columbia, which, under the name of Astoria, had been taken
possession of by the British early in the late war. This order, which
was formally carried out in October of that year, gains in significance
the more closely the whole history of the case is examined. Astoria, it
will be remembered, was the name of the trading post established in 1811
by the Pacific Fur Company, of which John Jacob Astor, of New York, was
founder and chief stockholder. It was nominally an American company,
and was established under the American flag; but of the party of
thirty-three that landed April 12, 1811, to form the settlement, all
except three are said to have been British subjects. On the twelfth
day of November, 1813, in the absence of Mr. Astor’s agent, who was an
American, Mr. McDougall, his sub-agent, a British subject, representing
himself and the other partners present, likewise British subjects,
signed the bills of sale, and delivered up Astoria to the Northwest
Company, a British company. One month later, Captain Black, of the
British navy, in the sloop-of-war, Racoon, arrived in the Columbia, and
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account