The quarterly of the Oregon Historical Society, Vol. 1, No. 3, September, 1900Oregon Historical Society
History
The quarterly of the Oregon Historical Society, Vol. 1, No. 3, September, 1900
Oregon Historical Society
Oregon -- History -- Periodicals
took possession of Astoria in the name of his sovereign, and in honor
of his sovereign changed the name to Fort George. He seems to have been
chagrined not a little to find that, instead of the glory of battering
down an American fort, nothing awaited him but to take peaceful
possession in the name of his king of a British settlement.
By the first article of the treaty of Ghent, “all territory, places, and
possessions whatsoever, taken by either party from the other during the
war” should be restored. In view of the history just given, it is not
strange that the British government, when called upon by the United
States to make restitution of Astoria in accordance with this article of
the treaty, objected, on the ground that the place was already a British
settlement when taken possession of by a British officer. And yet, in
the course of the negotiations that followed, Great Britain yielded this
point, and through her representative, Lord Castlereagh, “admitted, in
the most ample extent, our right to be reinstated, and to be the party
in possession while treating of the title.” Accordingly, October, 1818,
the order first issued January 26 preceding, was executed, and Fort
George was formally handed over to an American officer specially sent to
the Columbia to receive it, and once more the American flag floated over
this British settlement.
This act of restitution, under these circumstances, can hardly be
regarded as less than a concession on the part of Great Britain, a
concession the full significance of which appears only when the act of
restitution is taken in connection with the convention of joint
occupation entered into by the two governments that year, and with
certain intimations made by the British Plenipotentiaries in the
conferences which led up to that convention. It was in this convention
that the boundary between the two countries west from Lake of the Woods
to the Rocky Mountains on the forty-ninth parallel was agreed upon. In
the preliminary conferences the representatives of Great Britain
insisted that the boundary west of the Rocky Mountains should be settled
at the same time with the boundary eastward; that the two should stand
or fall together. In response to this wish, the American representatives
proposed that the same line of the forty-ninth parallel be extended
westward to the Pacific. This the representatives of Great Britain
refused to accept, nor would they themselves propose a line; but they
did intimate that the Columbia River itself was the most convenient
boundary that could be adopted, and that they would not agree to any
boundary that did not give to Great Britain a harbor at the mouth of the
Columbia River in common with the United States. The American
representatives not consenting to this, after further proposals and
counter proposals, none of which were acceptable to both governments, it
was finally agreed to adopt the now celebrated plan of joint occupation
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account