The quarterly of the Oregon Historical Society, Vol. 1, No. 3, September, 1900Oregon Historical Society
History
The quarterly of the Oregon Historical Society, Vol. 1, No. 3, September, 1900
Oregon Historical Society
Oregon -- History -- Periodicals
It was found by the commissioners appointed to determine a line in
accordance with this convention that in one part of the strait there
were two recognized channels, an easterly one, by the Straits of
Rosario, and a westerly one, by the Canal De Haro. The commissioners
failing to agree as to which of the channels was the channel
contemplated by the treaty, the determination of this portion of the
line was left in abeyance. It remained so until the year 1871, when the
joint high commission appointed to adjust sundry differences between the
two governments, met in Washington. By certain articles of a convention,
concluded at this time it was agreed by the representatives of the two
powers, to submit to the Emperor of Germany the question as to which of
the two channels was the more in accordance with the treaty of June 15,
1846, the commissioners pledging their respective governments to accept
his award as final. The Emperor of Germany submitted the question to
three experts, Doctor Grimm, Doctor Goldschmidt, and Doctor Kiepert. In
accordance with the report of these distinguished scholars, the Emperor
of Germany, on the twenty-first of October, 1872, rendered his decision,
that the line by way of the Canal De Haro was the one most in accordance
with the treaty. This decision was accepted by the two governments, and
the unsettled portion of the boundary line determined in accordance with
it.
Thus, after the vicissitudes of more than three-quarters of a century of
debate and negotiations, with the determination of this last detail, the
Oregon Question reached its full and final decision.
JOSEPH R. WILSON.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
REMINISCENCES OF HUGH COSGROVE
By H. S. LYMAN.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account