The quarterly of the Oregon Historical Society, Vol. 1, No. 3, September, 1900Oregon Historical Society
History
The quarterly of the Oregon Historical Society, Vol. 1, No. 3, September, 1900
Oregon Historical Society
Oregon -- History -- Periodicals
have been rendered into very good English fifty years ago, may now,
having become subject to the mutations of our fads of pronunciation, be
spoken quite differently from the original tongue.
But, after making all these allowances, due to our white man’s egotism,
ignorance and change of fashions, the main difficulty is in the
strangeness, and, it might be said, the rudimentariness of the Indian
sounds. Many, perhaps the most, of the aboriginal tones have no exact
phonetic equivalent in English. We must remember that their names were
originated away back in their own history, and were not affected by
contact with Europeans, and have therefore a primitive quality not found
even in the Jargon. This makes them more difficult, but certainly not
less interesting.
In general it will be found, I think, that the aboriginal languages have
the following peculiarities of pronunciation:
1. Almost all the sounds are pronounced farther back in the throat than
we pronounce them. This brings into use an almost entirely different
set of tones, or more exactly, it brings the various vocal sounds
produced by the vocal chords to a point at a different, and to us an
unused position of the throat or mouth—at a point where we can
scarcely catch and arrest the sound. This makes the vowel sounds in
general pectoral or ventral, and the consonant sounds guttural or
palatal. As to the consonants, also, it often gives them a clucking or
rasping sound not found in our language, unless in certain
exclamations.
2. As a consequence of the above, the vowel sounds are not very fully
distinguished from the subvowels. There is no “r” sound; if that is
ever seen in an Indian name it has been interpolated there by some
white mal-transliterator. “L” easily runs into “a,” and “m” into “b.”
Names that upon first pronunciation seem to have an “l” turn out upon
clearer sound to have a short Italian “a,” or those having an “m” to
be more exactly represented by “b.” Probably the fact as to “r” is
that it is identical in the aboriginal throat with long Italian “a,”
or the ah sound, as it still is with Easterners and Southerners.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account