The quest of the historical Jesus : $b a critical study of its progress from Reimarus to WredeSchweitzer, Albert
Religion
The quest of the historical Jesus : $b a critical study of its progress from Reimarus to Wrede
Schweitzer, Albert
Jesus Christ -- Biography -- History and criticism; Jesus Christ -- Historicity
In regard to the third problem which Strauss had offered for discussion,
the relation of the Synoptists to John, there was practically no response.
The only one of his critics who understood what was at stake was
Hengstenberg. He alone perceived the significance of the fact that
critical theology, having admitted mythical elements first in the Old
Testament, and then in the beginning and end of the Gospel history, and
having, in consequence of the latter admission, felt obliged to give up
the first three Gospels, retaining only the fourth, was now being besieged
by Strauss in its last stronghold. “They withdrew,” says the _Evangelische
Kirchenzeitung_, “into the Gospel of John as into a fortress, and boasted
that they were safe there, though they could not suppress a secret
consciousness that they only held it at the enemy’s pleasure; now the
enemy has appeared before it; he is using the same weapons with which he
was formerly victorious; the Gospel of John is in as desperate case as
formerly the Synoptists. The time has come to make a bold resolve, a
decisive choice; either they must give up everything, or else they must
successively re‐occupy the more advanced positions which at an earlier
date they had successively abandoned.” It would be impossible to give a
more accurate picture of the desperate position into which Hase and
Schleiermacher had brought the mediating theology by their ingenious
expedient of giving up the Synoptics in favour of the Gospel of John.
Before any danger threatened, they had abandoned the outworks and
withdrawn into the citadel, oblivious of the fact that they thereby
exposed themselves to the danger of having their own guns turned upon them
from the positions they had abandoned, and being obliged to surrender
without striking a blow the position of which they had boasted as
impregnable. It is impossible to emphasise strongly enough the fact that
it was not Strauss, but Hase and Schleiermacher, who had brought the
mediating theology into this hopeless position, in which the fall of the
Fourth Gospel carried with it the surrender of the historical tradition as
a whole.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account