The Real Gladstone: An Anecdotal BiographyRitchie, J. Ewing (James Ewing)
History
The Real Gladstone: An Anecdotal Biography
Ritchie, J. Ewing (James Ewing)
Gladstone, W. E. (William Ewart), 1809-1898
Cardinal Manning had been the principal leader in the Oxford Debating
Society till Mr. Gladstone appeared upon the scene. At once he and
Gaskell became the leading Christ Church orators, and the great
oratorical event of the time was Mr. Gladstone’s speech against the first
Reform Bill. ‘Most of the speakers,’ writes Sir Francis Doyle, who was
present on the occasion, ‘rose more or less above their ordinary level,
but when Mr. Gladstone sat down we all of us felt that an epoch in our
lives had arrived. It was certainly the finest speech of his that I ever
heard. The effect produced by that great speech led to his being
returned to Parliament as M.P. for Newark by the Tory Duke of Newcastle,
who is remembered for his question, “May I not do what I like with my
own?”’
To return to Mr. Gladstone’s career at the University. In 1831 he took a
double first-class, and would easily have attained a Fellowship in any
college where Fellowships depended upon a competitive examination. He
held with Scott, the foremost scholar of the day, the second place in the
Ireland for 1829. In that year a deputation from the Union of Cambridge
went to Oxford to take part in a debate on the respective merits of Byron
and Shelley. One of the Cambridge party was Monckton Milnes, afterwards
Lord Houghton. He writes: ‘The man that took me most was the youngest
Gladstone, of Liverpool—I am sure a very superior person.’ On all he
seems to have exercised a beneficial influence. He deprecated the
example of the gentlemen commoners, and did much to check the pernicious
habit prevalent at that time in the University, of over-indulgence in
wine. His tutor was the Rev. Robert Briscoe. He also attended the
lectures of the Rev. Dr. Benton on divinity and Dr. Pusey on Hebrew. He
read classics privately with a tutor of the Bishop of St. Andrews. In
1830 he was at Cuddesdon Vicarage with a small reading-party, where he
seems to have mastered Hooker’s ‘Ecclesiastical Polity.’ He founded and
presided over an essay society called after his name, of which he was
successively secretary and president. In his maiden speech at the Union
in 1830 he defended Catholic emancipation; declared the Duke of
Wellington’s Government unworthy of the confidence of the nation; opposed
the removal of Jewish disabilities; and argued for the gradual
emancipation of slavery rather than immediate abolition.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account