Books -- History -- 400-1450; Manuscripts; Paleography
The Bible is, truly, a supernatural book. One once confessed to an
abounding confidence in the plenary inspiration of the scriptures in
that he "accepted the Bible from 'lid' to 'lid'--and including the
'lid.'" But the supernaturalism which we believe belongs to or inheres
in the Bible does not attach to the "lids"--to the materials by means
of which the scriptures, as literature, have been communicated and
preserved from age to age. (The fact which is here suggested is all
apart from the question of inspiration.) God wastes no energies in a
miraculous preservation of the materials of books,--not even of the
materials of the "good Book." God does not violate, we think, the
great law of "parsimony" by exerting either superfluous or supernatural
energies for the accomplishment of His purposes. It was only when King
Jehoiakim in his blind rage and folly cut the "roll" in pieces and
burnt its mutilated fragments, that the supernatural energies were
called into requisition to _restore_ the "words of the book, which
Jehoiakim, king of Judah, had burned with fire." (Jeremiah 36:32.) God
has, however, guarded, preserved, and treasured--and in a marvelous,
not to say supernatural manner--the "revelation" contained in the "good
Book" so that no age has been left without its ample and unimpeachable
witness. And this is all that we may reasonably demand for a revelation
that is intended and destined to be authoritative, universal, and
final. The destruction of the materials of books does not weigh if the
contents are preserved. The impious King of Judah did not destroy the
holy law of God when he utterly destroyed the parchment upon which it
was inscribed. What mattered it if the "roll" was consumed since God
had His faithful prophet and his scribe to produce another and ampler
roll? And what matters it if a given copy, or any number of copies
of a book, or of the Bible, be lost or destroyed so long as other
unnumbered copies of the same are preserved beyond the reach of bad men
or the destructive forces of corroding and destroying time? It does not
matter, supremely, since it is the contents and not the materials of a
book that claims the supreme consideration.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account