The religions of ancient Egypt and BabyloniaSayce, A. H. (Archibald Henry)
Religion
The religions of ancient Egypt and Babylonia
Sayce, A. H. (Archibald Henry)
Assyro-Babylonian religion; Egypt -- Religion
Closely connected with this conception of “another world” is the
conception which man forms concerning his own nature. There are few races
of mankind among whom we do not find in one shape or another the belief in
a second self. Sometimes this second self is in all respects a reflection
and image of the living self, like the images of those we see in our
dreams; and it is more than probable that dreams first suggested it.
Sometimes it is a mere speck of grey vapour, which may owe its origin to
the breath which issues from the mouth and seems to forsake it at death,
or to the misty forms seen after nightfall by the savage in the gloom of
the forest and by the edge of the morass. At times it is conceived of as a
sort of luminous gas or a phosphorescent flash of light, such as is
emitted by decaying vegetation in a damp soil. Or, again, it may be
likened to the bird that flies to heaven, to the butterfly which hovers
from flower to flower, or even to insects like the grasshopper which hop
along the ground. But however it may be envisaged, it is at once
impalpable and material, something that can be perceived by the senses and
yet eludes the grasp.
The Egyptian theory of the nature of man in the historical age of the
nation was very complicated. Man was made up of many parts, each of which
was capable of living eternally. The belief in his composite character was
due to the composite character of the people as described in the last
lecture, added to that conservative tendency which prevented them from
discarding or even altering any part of the heritage of the past. Some at
least of the elements which went “to the making of man” were derived from
different elements in the population. They had been absorbed, or rather
co-ordinated, in the State religion, with little regard to their mutual
compatibility and with little effort to reconcile them. Hence it is
somewhat difficult to distinguish them all one from another; indeed, it is
a task which no Egyptian theologian even attempted; and when we find the
list of them given in full, it is doubtless to secure that no component
part of the individual should be omitted, the name of which had been
handed down from the generations of old.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account