The religions of ancient Egypt and Babylonia — John Shaqi
The religions of ancient Egypt and BabyloniaSayce, A. H. (Archibald Henry)
Religion
The religions of ancient Egypt and Babylonia
Sayce, A. H. (Archibald Henry)
Assyro-Babylonian religion; Egypt -- Religion
There were, however, certain component parts which were clearly defined,
and which occupied an important place in the religious ideas of Egypt.
Foremost amongst these was the _Ka_ or “Double.” Underneath the conception
of the Ka lay a crude philosophy of the universe. The Ka corresponded with
the shadow in the visible world. Like the shadow which cannot be detached
from the object, so, too, the Ka or Double is the reflection of the object
as it is conceived of in the mind. But the Egyptian did not realise that
it was only a product of the mind. For him it was as real and material as
the shadow itself; indeed, it was much more material, for it had an
independent existence of its own. It could be separated from the object of
which it was the facsimile and presentment, and represent it elsewhere.
Nay, more than this, it was what gave life and form to the object of which
it was the image; it constituted, in fact, its essence and personality.
Hence it was sometimes interchanged with the “Name” which, in the eyes of
the Egyptian, was the essence of the thing itself, without which the thing
could not exist. In a sense the Ka was the spiritual reflection of an
object, but it was a spiritual reflection which had a concrete form.
The “ideas” of Plato were the last development of the Egyptian doctrine of
the Ka. They were the archetypes after which all things have been made,
and they are archetypes which are at once abstract and concrete. Modern
philosophers have transformed them into the thoughts of God, which realise
themselves in concrete shape. But to the ancient Egyptian the concrete
side of his conception was alone apparent. That the Ka was a creation of
his own mind never once occurred to him. It had a real and substantial
existence in the world of gods and men, even though it was not visible to
the outward senses. Everything that he knew or thought of had its double,
and he never suspected that it was his own act of thought which brought it
into being.
It was symbolism again that was to blame. Once more the symbol was
confused with that for which it stood, and the abstract was translated
into the concrete. The abstract idea of personality became a substantial
thing, to which all the attributes of substantial objects were attached.
Like the “Name,” which was a force with a concrete individuality of its
own, the Ka was as much an individual entity as the angels of Christian
belief.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account