The Religious Life of LondonRitchie, J. Ewing (James Ewing)
Religion
The Religious Life of London
Ritchie, J. Ewing (James Ewing)
London (England) -- Religion; Religious thought -- England -- London
In process of time heresy came to have a bad meaning attached to it. It
is easy to see why this should be so. We naturally prefer our own
opinions to those of other people. We naturally prefer the society of
those who hold our own opinions to the society of those who do not. Life
is short, and we do not want to be always disputing. Life to most of us
is hard, and it would be harder still if after a day’s toil Paterfamilias
had to discuss the three births of Christ, or His twofold nature, the
Æons of the Gnostics, the Judaism of the Ebionites, the ancient Persian
dualism which formed the fundamental idea of the system of Manes, or the
windy frenzy of Montanus, with an illogical wife, a friend gifted with a
fatal flow of words, or a pert and shallow child. We like those with
whom we constantly associate. They are wise men and sound Christians.
They are those who fast and pay tithes, and are eminently proper and
respectable. As to the heretics—the publicans and sinners, away with
them. Let their portion be shame in this life, perdition in the next.
Thus it is heretics have got a bad name. Church history has been written
by their enemies, by men who have honestly believed that a man of a
different heresy to their own would rob an orphan, and break all the
commandments. The Rev. Mr. Thwackem “doubted not but all the infidels
and heretics in the world would, if they could, confine honour to their
own absurd errors and damnable deceptions.” The phrase “absurd errors
and damnable deceptions,” is one a real theologian might envy, or at any
rate appropriate. In another sense also that hero of fiction is a type
of the spirit in which orthodox people often (thankfully we record the
existence of a better spirit in our day) have written on theology. “When
I mean religion,” cries Thwackem, “I mean the Christian religion, and not
only the Christian religion, but the Protestant religion, and not only
the Protestant religion, but the Church of England.”
Still the question occurs, What is heresy?
It is not difficult to say what it is not. The African Bishops on one
occasion, in council in Carthage, decided that heretics were not at all
any part of the Church of Christ, but this opinion was modified by a
later council. “Heretics,” writes Epiphanius, “are divided into two
kinds: those who receive the Christian religion, but err in parts, who
when they come over to the Church are anointed with oil; and those who do
not receive it at all and are unbelievers, such as Jews and Greeks, and
these we baptize.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account