The Revolution in Tanner's LaneWhite, William Hale
General
The Revolution in Tanner's Lane
White, William Hale
England -- Fiction; Religious fiction
intensely dramatic, and what are shadows to the careless reader become
living human beings, with the reddest of blood visible under their skin.
On this particular evening Mr. Bradshaw took the story of Jephthah’s
daughter:—“The Spirit of the Lord came upon Jephthah.” Here is an
abstract of his discourse. “It _was_ the Spirit of the Lord,
notwithstanding what happened. I beg you also to note that there is a
mistranslation in our version. The Hebrew has it, ‘Then it shall be,
that _whosoever_’—not _whatsoever_—‘cometh forth of the doors of my house
to meet me, when I return in peace from the children of Ammon, shall
surely be the Lord’s, and I will offer _him_’—not _it_—‘up for a
burnt-offering.’ Nevertheless I believe my text—it _was_ the Spirit of
the Lord. This Hebrew soldier was the son of a harlot. He was driven by
his brethren out of his father’s house. Ammon made war upon Israel, and
in their distress the elders of Israel went to fetch Jephthah. Mark, my
friends, God’s election. The children of the lawful wife are passed by,
and the child of the harlot is chosen. Jephthah forgets his grievances
and becomes captain of the host. Ammon is over against them. Jephthah’s
rash vow—this is sometimes called. I say it is not a rash vow. It may
be rash to those who have never been brought to extremity by the children
of Ammon—to those who have not cared whether Ammon or Christ wins. Men
and women sitting here in comfortable pews”—this was said with a kind of
snarl—“may talk of Jephthah’s rash vow. God be with them, what do they
know of the struggles of such a soul? It does not say so directly in the
Bible, but we are led to infer it, that Jephthah was successful because
of his vow. ‘The Lord delivered them into his hands.’ He would not have
done it if He had been displeased with the ‘rash vow’” (another snarl).
“He smote them from Aroer even till thou come to Minnith. Ah, but what
follows? The Omnipotent and Omniscient might have ordered it, surely,
that a slave might have met Jephthah. Why, in His mercy, did He not do
it? Who are we that we should question what He did? But if we may not
inquire too closely into His designs, it is permitted us, my friends,
when His reason accords with ours, to try and show it. Jephthah had
played for a great stake. Ought the Almighty—let us speak it with
reverence—to have let him off with an ox, or even with a serf? I say
that if we are to conquer Ammon we must pay for it, and we ought to pay
for it. Yes, and perhaps God wanted the girl—who can tell? Jephthah
comes back in triumph. Let me read the passage to you:—‘Behold his
daughter came out to meet him with timbrels and with dances: _and she was
his only child_: _beside her he had neither son nor daughter_. And it
came to pass, when he saw her, that he rent his clothes, and said, Alas,
my daughter! thou hast brought me very low, and thou art one of them that
trouble me: for I have opened my mouth unto the Lord, and I cannot go
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account