The Rod in Pickle; or, An Answer to the Appeal of John Church, the Obelisk Preacher: Containing an Authentic Narrative of the Cause of His Leaving Banbury, in Oxfordshire: Together With the Charges Exhibited Against Him, the Meeting of His Friends in Consequence of Those Charges, and the Result of That Meeting. To Which Are Added, His Letters, Written to the Managers of the Banbury Meeting-House, Begging Them Not to Let the Cause of His Dismissal Be Known in London.Latham, T.
History
The Rod in Pickle; or, An Answer to the Appeal of John Church, the Obelisk Preacher: Containing an Authentic Narrative of the Cause of His Leaving Banbury, in Oxfordshire: Together With the Charges Exhibited Against Him, the Meeting of His Friends in Consequence of Those Charges, and the Result of That Meeting. To Which Are Added, His Letters, Written to the Managers of the Banbury Meeting-House, Begging Them Not to Let the Cause of His Dismissal Be Known in London.
Latham, T.
Church, J. (John), approximately 1780-approximately 1825 -- Trials, litigation, etc.; Trials (Sodomy) -- England
pounds, and he said, that if those papers appeared in London against him,
his friends there must all forsake him; and then he, Mr. Lambart, must
loose his money, which he could not afford to do; and, therefore, until
he had got that he would sign nothing against him; though, when he had
got his money he did not care if Church was hanged; this much I heard Mr.
Lambart assert. This caused a demur, and though the other parties all
wished the papers to go, they could not without Mr. Lambart’s name, for
the reason mentioned above. After some deliberations and consultations,
it was represented by some, that they were likely to get into a deal of
trouble if those papers were sent to London: that if Mr. Church was taken
into custody, and had to undergo an examination, that they should have to
attend as witnesses; and as they could not foresee all the inconveniences
that might ensue both to themselves and also to Church; and as they had
now done with him as their Minister, they finally agreed to suppress the
papers, and leave him to get on in London in the best manner he could.
After my engagement at Banbury was fulfilled, I returned home; but when
arrived in London, before the coach reached the inn at which it was to
stop, a person called to the coachman, and inquired for my name; the
coachman stopped and asked, if any passenger in the coach answered to
that name: I answered, and was requested by the unknown person to
accompany him to James’s-street, Covent-garden, where the congregation
and minister were waiting for me, and would not proceed until I arrived.
This appeared singular to me, but, guessing the reason, I went with him
to the place. As soon as I arrived the service went on, and at the close
of the sermon, the preacher addressed the people; and, pointing to me,
told them that I was just come up from Banbury, where I had been a month
with the people that Mr. Church had left, and that from me they might
have a true account of what had passed. Then he spoke to me: “Do, dear
brother, stand up and tell the people what you know about this affair;”
and, having thus spoke, sat him down. All eyes were now on me, and I was
obliged to rise and say something: I told the people I found myself
awkwardly situated—just come from the coach—my thoughts uncollected on
the subject—and an entire stranger both to them and Mr. Church, whom I
had never seen; I wished to speak with caution—though I must confess that
at Banbury there were reports in circulation very unfavourable to him,
and proofs of his having acted with imprudence and indiscretion. I then
mentioned what was said by the boys at Kingham, and begged to be excused
from saying more. The Minister then made a very warm harrangue to the
people at some length, and so the business terminated at that time.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account