The Rod in Pickle; or, An Answer to the Appeal of John Church, the Obelisk Preacher: Containing an Authentic Narrative of the Cause of His Leaving Banbury, in Oxfordshire: Together With the Charges Exhibited Against Him, the Meeting of His Friends in Consequence of Those Charges, and the Result of That Meeting. To Which Are Added, His Letters, Written to the Managers of the Banbury Meeting-House, Begging Them Not to Let the Cause of His Dismissal Be Known in London.Latham, T.
History
The Rod in Pickle; or, An Answer to the Appeal of John Church, the Obelisk Preacher: Containing an Authentic Narrative of the Cause of His Leaving Banbury, in Oxfordshire: Together With the Charges Exhibited Against Him, the Meeting of His Friends in Consequence of Those Charges, and the Result of That Meeting. To Which Are Added, His Letters, Written to the Managers of the Banbury Meeting-House, Begging Them Not to Let the Cause of His Dismissal Be Known in London.
Latham, T.
Church, J. (John), approximately 1780-approximately 1825 -- Trials, litigation, etc.; Trials (Sodomy) -- England
As soon as Messrs. T. and J. Gardenner returned from inquiring into the
affair at Kingham, and had reported the testimony of the boys and others
to the people at Banbury, it was concluded to write to Church at
Birmingham, and inform him of the result of their inquiries, and to let
him know they disowned him as their Minister, desiring him at the same
time not to return to Banbury on any account. The letter he sent in
answer to theirs was made up of concessions and apologies,
self-criminations and excuses, half confessions, evasive retractions of
those confessions, and evidently showed his mind while writing it to be
much agitated. Some of his own words are: “I have done foolishly—I have
acted most imprudently; O! how I have wounded the dear cause of God at
Banbury:—O! it breaks my very heart to think how I have given the enemies
of the blessed Gospel cause to blaspheme on my account:—O! how I have
abused the kindness of the best of friends:—O! if it be possible, don’t
let the cause be known of my being absent from Banbury: you may say I am
gone on a journey, and you will speak the truth; but, oh! my dear
friends, I must return to you again; I cannot think of parting with you;
do say that I may return; I must, indeed I must, or I shall die with
grief.” Elsewhere he says, “the boys tell a _simple plain story_, and
you do _right to believe them_ in what they say; and I own that I have
been too imprudent, _but I am not conscious of having done the actual
crime_; if any thing of that nature has been of which they speak, it must
have been without my knowledge, when I was asleep, and supposing I was in
my own bed with my wife; but I know of no criminal intention or act,
except in this way.” The letter runs all in this strain, with frequent
petitions to be permitted to return, and almost insisting on that being
granted. To this he had an answer sent from the principals of the
congregation, in which, after treating the subject in a suitable manner,
they tell him:—“You must not by any means or on any account whatever
think of returning to Banbury, for we assure you that such is the
abhorrence in which the crime you are accused of, is held by the people
in Banbury, that were you to presume to come, neither your person nor the
Meeting would be in safety.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account