The Roman Index of Forbidden Books: Briefly Explained for Catholic Booklovers and StudentsBetten, Francis S. (Francis Sales)
Religion
The Roman Index of Forbidden Books: Briefly Explained for Catholic Booklovers and Students
Betten, Francis S. (Francis Sales)
Index librorum prohibitorum; Prohibited books
If they think the book should be examined, it is handed to a
consultor, who has to study it carefully and to draw up a detailed
report, noting exactly the passages which he finds objectionable, and
conscientiously pointing out all redeeming features. His report
together with the book is passed on to other consultors, each of whom
can thus satisfy himself whether the first “examiner’s” verdict is
fair, and has also an opportunity to formulate his own view. One
question they have to answer is, whether the condemnation is likely to
have a good effect.
After comparing the opinions of the consultors, the secretary of the
Congregation draws up an official statement of the reasons for and
against a prohibition, which statement together with the book is
submitted to the Cardinal Prefect, by whose orders it is printed and a
copy sent to each cardinal and consultor of the Congregation.
Next a preparatory meeting of the consultors is called for a previous
discussion. The consultor who examined the book speaks first, then all
the others, beginning with the youngest. The secretary carefully
records the views of each consultor, together with his reasons.
At least ten days must elapse between this meeting and the solemn
session of the whole Congregation, in which the question is finally
decided by a vote of the cardinals.
The decision arrived at is commonly given in one of these four
technical phrases: _Damnetur_, “condemned”; _dimittatur_,
“dismissed”; _donec corrigatur_, “forbidden until amended”; _res
dilata_, “the case is postponed.” The verdict _donec corrigatur_ of
course, can only be given when a book admits of correction; when it is
thoroughly bad (e. g. written for the sole purpose of eulogizing
Freemasonry or maligning Catholic bishops), a _donec corrigatur_ would
have no meaning.
Finally, the secretary of the Congregation lays the whole matter
before the Pope, who, if he sees fit, authorizes the publication of
the decree.
Nobody will deny that this is a very excellent method of procedure.
Under it a book is examined at least three times, and twenty-five or
thirty picked scholars participate in the proceedings, each of whom
has taken a solemn oath never to allow himself to be influenced by
sympathy or antipathy and to have nothing in view but the eternal
welfare of souls.
If the author is a Catholic, he must be informed before the decree is
published. If but a few copies of the book have been sold, and the
author promises either to suppress it, or to issue an amended edition,
if possible, the decree is not published. But even when this cannot be
prevented, e. g. when a whole edition is already in circulation,
credit is given to the author in the decree itself for declaring his
submission, by adding the words: _auctor laudabiliter se subjecit_,
“the author has praiseworthily submitted.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account