The Roman Wall: A historical, topographical, and descriptive account of the barrier of the lower isthmus, extending from the Tyne to the Solway, deduced from numerous personal surveysBruce, J. Collingwood (John Collingwood)
History
The Roman Wall: A historical, topographical, and descriptive account of the barrier of the lower isthmus, extending from the Tyne to the Solway, deduced from numerous personal surveys
Bruce, J. Collingwood (John Collingwood)
Great Britain -- Antiquities, Roman; Walls, Roman -- Great Britain
It is the tradition of the country that all the stones of the Wall
were handed from one man to another by a set of labourers stationed in
a line from the quarry to the place where they were required. Many
will tell you, 'I have heard my mother say, that the Wall was built in
a single night, and that no one was observed to be engaged upon it,
save an old woman with an apron full of stones.'—This, however, is a
tradition of almost universal application.
The people say that the Wall was hollow, or, as they express it, had a
flue running the whole length of it, through which the sentinels
communicated intelligence by a speaking trumpet.
Some of the people of this neighbourhood tell me that the Britons,
tired, at length, of Roman oppression, rose in a body, and drove the
garrison, with considerable slaughter, from all their stations. The
Romans, when making their way to the sea to look for ships to carry
them home, were met by a seer, who told them that if they returned
home they would all be drowned; and if they went back to their old
stations they would all be slain. This prophecy disconcerted them
greatly, and they were at their wits’ end; however, after long
consultation, they resolved to escape both calamities by marching
direct to Wales. This they did, and there the pure, unadulterated
Roman breed is to be found to this day.—Can this story refer to the
passage of the second legion, at an early period, to Caerleon?
[Sidenote: LEGENDS OF KING ARTHUR.]
We next pass on to some tales, which, though not connected with the
Wall, belong, as Hodgson remarks, to times nearer the Roman than these
degenerate days. They chiefly relate to king Arthur. Sir William Betham
observes that this monarch’s name is more celebrated in Scotland than in
Wales, which was the chief resort of the conquered Britons, and is
disposed to think, that this favourite hero of romance was not a
Romanized Briton, but an invading Pictish king. This idea would account
for the frequent reference to his name in the region of the Wall.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account