The Roman Wall: A historical, topographical, and descriptive account of the barrier of the lower isthmus, extending from the Tyne to the Solway, deduced from numerous personal surveysBruce, J. Collingwood (John Collingwood)
History
The Roman Wall: A historical, topographical, and descriptive account of the barrier of the lower isthmus, extending from the Tyne to the Solway, deduced from numerous personal surveys
Bruce, J. Collingwood (John Collingwood)
Great Britain -- Antiquities, Roman; Walls, Roman -- Great Britain
After all, I cannot but take notice of two things with regard to the
Wall, that have given me great matter of speculation. The first is,
why it was made at all, for it could never be a proper defence, and
perhaps at Bowness less than at any other place, since our barbarian
forefathers on the north side could pass over at low water, and if the
sea was higher or deeper than it is now, could make their attacks from
the north-east side by land.—The second is, why the Scots historians,
vain enough by nature, have not taken more pains to describe the Wall,
a performance which did their ancestors more honour than all the
trifling stories put together which they have transmitted to us. It is
true the Romans walled out humanity from us; but it is as certain they
thought the Caledonians a very formidable people, when they at so much
labour and cost built this Wall; as before they had made a Vallum
between the Forth and the Clyde.
[Sidenote: THE BARRIER NOT A NAKED WALL.]
The Romans did not oppose to the enemy a single line of fortification
only, which, by some casual negligence on their part, or a sudden
exertion of desperate bravery on the side of their antagonists, might in
a moment be rendered useless. In addition to the Wall, stationary camps
were planted along its whole course, at a few miles distance from it,
both to the north and the south; so that, in reality, a triple line of
fortresses was opposed to the passage of an enemy from either quarter.
These subsidiary stations were connected with the garrisons on the Wall,
and to some extent with each other, by good roads. In maintaining a
surveillance over an enemy, whether to the north or the south of the
chief member of the fortification, in furnishing a secure retreat for
the soldiery when venturing beyond their line, and in stemming the first
shock of an onset, the importance of the out-stations cannot be
over-rated.
[Sidenote: THE SUPPORTING FORTS OF DIFFERENT ERAS.]
It is not contended that all the stations which are immediately on the
north and south of the Wall were erected with the express view of
supporting it. Several of them doubtless were, but others, there is
reason to believe, were made by Agricola, before the Wall was projected
or thought of. All that is necessary for us to admit is, that they
contributed materially to the strength of the main structure, and as
such, formed an important element in the calculations of the engineer of
the Wall.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account