The Roman Wall: A historical, topographical, and descriptive account of the barrier of the lower isthmus, extending from the Tyne to the Solway, deduced from numerous personal surveysBruce, J. Collingwood (John Collingwood)
History
The Roman Wall: A historical, topographical, and descriptive account of the barrier of the lower isthmus, extending from the Tyne to the Solway, deduced from numerous personal surveys
Bruce, J. Collingwood (John Collingwood)
Great Britain -- Antiquities, Roman; Walls, Roman -- Great Britain
The force of these remarks will more clearly appear after ascertaining
what inscriptions bear the name of Severus. If we turn to the inquiry
with the impression that he built the more important member of the
Barrier, we might expect to find the evidences of the activity which
prevailed in his day more abundant than in the time of Hadrian. Such,
however, is not the fact. The one at Hexham (p. 340) was the only
inscription to Severus which was known to Gordon and Horsley. Well might
Gordon, who maintained the Septimian theory, denominate it—‘a very
precious jewel of antiquity.’ Hexham is nearly four miles south of the
Wall. To this must be added the altar discovered at Old Carlisle (p.
360), which is about ten miles distant from the Wall; and another in a
dilapidated state, found at the same place; and the gateway slab found
at HABITANCUM (p. 315), one of the _castra exploratorum_ nearly ten
miles in advance of the Wall, recording the restoration of part of the
fortifications there. Besides these, I know not of any inscriptions to
Severus. I purposely omit all reference to an altar, said to have been
discovered at Netherby, bearing the inscription SEPT. SEVERO IMP. QVI
MVRVM HVNC CONDIDIT, because, both Gordon and Horsley pronounce it to be
spurious.
[Sidenote: THE GELT QUARRY.]
Much importance is attached by those who advocate the claims of Severus
to the inscription on the face of the ancient quarry, on the river Gelt.
Here, it may be said, is the very spot from which the stones of the Wall
were taken, and the precise date is fixed—the consulship of Aper and
Maximus. That the quarry was used by the Romans at this period, is not a
matter of dispute, but it is very questionable whether much of the stone
from it was used in the building of the Wall, because, suitable
materials could be procured nearer at hand. The year in which Aper and
Maximus were consuls was A.D. 207; the year in which, according to the
received reckoning, Severus came to Britain, was that in which Geta and
Caracalla were consuls, A.D. 208.[136] It is not likely that Severus
would order the stones to be quarried before his arrival in Britain.
But, allowing that the chronology of Severus’ reign is to be received
with some latitude, and granting that he had landed in Britain in A.D.
207, some time would necessarily elapse in making inquiries into the
state of the country, and no inconsiderable period would be occupied in
making surveys, even after the construction of the Wall had been
determined on. The quarry has probably been wrought for some ordinary
purpose, perhaps for the erection of some buildings in the station near
Brampton, at the period in question.
[Sidenote: HADRIAN’S QUARRIES.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account