Until the photographic eyes of Science detected the peculiarities of
comets, and mathematicians calculated with unerring accuracy their
comings and goings, they were looked upon, as we have already seen, with
more or less suspicion and dread. Nowadays, we know that these “airy
nothings,” as Sir John Herschel termed them, have been unjustly
maligned. Were they given the power of speech, they could a tale unfold
of adventurous thrills and overwhelming disasters encountered during
their voyages in space, far exceeding in interest any story of
terrestrial adventure. It would take the pen of a Jules Verne and an
author gifted with his vivid imagination to describe the erratic career
of a comet.
Take for instance the tragic fate of the headless comet of 1887, which
was described by Dr. Thomé of the Cordoba University as:
“a beautiful object with a narrow, straight, sharply defined
graceful tail over fifty degrees long. It was shining with a soft
starry light against a dark sky, beginning apparently without a
head, and gradually widening and fading as it extended upwards.”[4]
Now the popular idea of a well-regulated comet is a star with a tail,
but a tail without an accompanying star seems preposterous, yet a
headless comet this object remained as viewed with the naked eye. The
why and the wherefore of the tragedy is unknown, and whether it ever had
a head and what became of it remains one of the many unsolved problems
of the sky.
Still more remarkable is the career of the famous comet of Biela, from
its first appearance as viewed by mortal eyes on March 8, 1772, until
its final disappearance, a century later, in a veritable blaze of
celestial fireworks. Its story reads like a novel, and is far more
fascinating because it is fact and not fiction. The hero is a faint,
insignificant-looking object which was discovered by Montaigne of
Limoges, already referred to as the comet-hunter who so indiscreetly
found the thirteenth comet for which his colleague Messier was
industriously searching. Little did Montaigne guess that this foggy
speck of light which was so faint that it could only be seen with the
aid of his small telescope would one day attract worldwide attention.
Its nondescript appearance, with a tail only one-eighth the diameter of
the moon, made it apparently scarcely worthy of more than passing
notice. Had Montaigne concentrated his efforts on finding out its
peculiarities and tracing its path, his name would have been forever
connected with the little wanderer, instead of being entered in the
annals of astronomy as merely the first to see it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account