Not only was the time for the nearest approach of the comet computed,
but its exact path among the stars was worked out with such accuracy
that directions could be given as to the precise point toward which the
telescope must be directed when the comet came within range of
observation. On August 5, 1835, when M. Dumouchel, director of the
observatory of the Roman College, turned his telescope in the direction
indicated and looked through the tube, to his great delight he saw the
comet as a faint and almost invisible stain of light on the deep blue of
the heavens. Thus did science triumph in a most remarkable manner, the
comet making its nearest approach within nine days of the predicted
time. It appeared as a nearly circular misty object near to the
predicted place, and began to develop a tail about the middle of
September, which attained a length of about twenty-four degrees, or
nearly five times the distance between the pointers, Alpha and Beta, in
the constellation of Ursa Major. To the naked eye the head of the comet
resembled a reddish star rather brighter than Antares in the
constellation of the Scorpion. Bessel compared it to a blazing coal, and
called attention to the peculiar fan-like haze of luminous matter
forming the train, which seemed to sway to and fro like a pendulum
across the radius vector, an imaginary line joining the sun and the
nucleus of the comet. This oscillation took place during a period of
four and three-fifths days. He came to the conclusion that a repulsive
force about twice as powerful as the attractive force of gravity was
responsible for the production of these remarkable effects, thus
anticipating the theory according to which the very fine particles
forming the train of a comet may be driven away from the direction of
the sun by radiation pressure.
Meanwhile Halley’s comet was passing through a remarkable series of
transformations, first appearing as a nebula, then as a well-regulated
comet with nucleus and train, next shining as a star, and finally
dilating till it resembled a ball, then assuming paraboloidal form about
May 5, 1836, after which it vanished as if melting into adjacent space
through the excessive diffusion of its light. Moreover, it lost its tail
previous to its arrival at perihelion on November 16, nor did it begin
to recover its elongated shape until more than two months later.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account