In some quarters this time is considered as absolutely accurate and
definitely fixed, but there are so many factors to be taken into
account that we should hesitate to regard them as unalterable. The
Nile, it is true, has been depositing mud at the rate of 4 inches to
the century in modern times, but this is no proof that it has always
deposited mud at this rate, and there may have been considerable
changes in the rate at which the mud banks have grown on each side
of the stream. We know the floods vary considerably, and the rate of
deposition must vary similarly. There seems at least the possibility
that it took twice as long as the accepted estimate to deposit the
mud on each side of the river, that is twenty thousand years. For
aught we know, it may have taken two hundred thousand years.
It will be seen how difficult it is in dealing with the lapse of
such ages to mention any definite dates. This is why the men who are
digging up the past in Egypt refer to Dynasties, starting with the
First Dynasty, and working up to the last or Thirtieth Dynasty.
A great deal has been done towards discovering the names of the
various kings in the different Dynasties, but there are still many
gaps to fill in. Most of our information in this respect has been
given us by a list of names compiled by a priest named Manetho, who
lived about two thousand one hundred years ago. Manetho undoubtedly
based his names of kings on more ancient lists which have totally
disappeared, but that he was fairly accurate is borne out by the
Turin papyrus so far as it has been translated. The difficulty with
this papyrus is that it was discovered in a number of fragments, and
some parts of it are missing. However, the parts that remain have
been most carefully pieced together, and seem to verify Manetho’s
list, which starts with Menes, who is looked upon as the first king
of the First Dynasty, and is thought to have reigned about seven
thousand years ago.
Throughout the ages that followed the reign of Menes, there grew up
those religious beliefs and quaint burial customs which have done so
much to unfold to us the life of the past. At first sight there seems
to be no reason for all the statues, the tiny figures, and wonderful
wall inscriptions to be found in the ancient tombs of Egypt. It seems
incomprehensible that the dead should be buried with food and flowers
beside them, that all this artistic talent should be wasted in this
manner. Yet some such customs exist in all lands, and survive to
this day, for we still place wreaths of flowers on the graves of our
departed in memory of them, but actually the giving of a wreath is
based on a custom that recedes so far back that all trace of it has
been lost.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account