The Romance of the London DirectoryBardsley, Charles Wareing Endell
History
The Romance of the London Directory
Bardsley, Charles Wareing Endell
Names, English -- England -- London; Names, Personal -- England -- London
such as Elliot (the pet name of Ellis), Eliot, Elliotson, Ellice, Ellicot
(the pet form of Ellice), Ellison, Elkins, Elkinson, Elcock, Ell, Else,
Elson, and a dozen other dresses in which the name is arrayed, all of
which I shall explain hereafter, we have no less than 370 representatives
of Elias. That the Crusades brought “John” and “Elias” into favour in
England is easily proved, and I shall have a word to say about the matter
in another chapter. There are a hundred interesting remarks to make
about such names as these, if one allowed oneself to be tempted out of
the beaten track, but I control myself. Notice lastly, that under “D”
one-tenth of the names are foreign—that is, of recent importation from
the Continent. The explanation of such a large proportion is that very
many foreign local surnames preserve the “de,” or “del,” or “de la,” as a
prefix. “De Jersey,” “De Grelle,” “Delattre,” “Delcroix,” “Delavanti;”so
they run.
In concluding this chapter, the question may be asked—and a very
important one it is—how many differently spelled names, counting a single
spelling as one, are there in each class? The answer to this will show
the vast predominance of local names in our Directories. If we exclude
foreign (nearly all local) and doubtful (of which three-fifths must be
looked upon as local), then the local class under A, B, C, D, and E, is
double all the rest. We may prejudge that this ratio applies to the
whole alphabet.
Local. Baptismal. Occupation. Official. Nickname. Foreign. Doubtful. Total.
A 153 120 9 8 4 101 41 436
B 917 158 86 43 120 307 176 1807
C 952 168 100 48 122 231 173 1794
D 310 174 17 6 40 336 75 958
E 255 149 0 2 13 92 29 540
Total 2587 769 212 107 299 1067 494 5535
Thus the total number of distinct surnames in the London Directory under
the first five letters is 5535. Omitting foreign and doubtful, the local
class are double the rest. Therefore the rhyme quoted by Camden is true,
that
“In ‘ford,’ in ‘ham,’ in ‘ley,’ and ‘ton,’
The most of English surnames run.”
All names with this termination are local, and comprise a large
proportion of our national nomenclature.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account