The Romaunce of the Sowdone of Babylone and of Ferumbras His Sone Who Conquerede Rome
General
The Romaunce of the Sowdone of Babylone and of Ferumbras His Sone Who Conquerede Rome
Charlemagne, Emperor, 742-814 -- Romances; English poetry -- Middle English, 1100-1500; Romances, English
1974 Florippe his doȝtre þe 2712 Floripas la «courtoise» a
«cortoyse» in «chambre» þar le «nois» escoute Puis issi de
she was In þe «paleys» yhurde la «cambre», . . . Entresi c’au
«noise» and þyder þan she gas «palais» . .
2007 þow ert «asotid» 2733 . . vous voi «assoté».
2538 a gret «repref» it were 3136 . . il nous est «reprouvé»
3665 brydel and «paytrel» and al 4117 Li estrier furent d’or,
þe gere wiþ fyn gold yharneyssed rices fu li «poitrés»
were
3672 and þe king him gan «ascrie» 4126 . . . si s’est haut «escriés».
3791 a gret «dul» þay made þere 4236 . . demainent grant «dolour»
4541 with an hard «crestid» 4832 vestu ot la pel d’un dur
«serpentis» fel «serpent» «cresté»
5753 on þan ston a «cracchede» 5910 en «despit» de Ihesu ens es
and in a spatte in «dispit» of fous «ecraca».
god, etc.
Besides these undoubted examples of translation, we must bear in mind
that there occur some variations of readings, where, indeed, the author
of «Syr Ferumbras» seems to have introduced slight incidents and
modifications. But examining them more closely, we shall soon become
aware that many of them also point to a French original, which we may
sometimes identify by comparing these variations with the readings of
those French MSS. that are already printed. Thus, the words “þarto
ys stede þan tyeþ he,” l. 91, render exactly a line of the Escorial
MS.[36]—“son cheval aresna à l’abricel rose”—which is omitted in l. 93
of «F» («i. e.» the French «Fierabras», as edited by MM. Krœber and
Servois).[37] [p-xix]
The following is another example of A (= the Ashmolean «Ferumbras»)
differing from «F», but agreeing with «E»:
A. E.
175 Ne «lyre» he noȝt þys day til 175 ke il puisse tant «vivre» que
evene cis jours soit passés
2131 Adoun þay gunne falle, 2833 Issi «agenoillierent» par
«knellyng» on þe erthe stille bones volentez
... & «kussedem» «everechone», ... «Ils baissent» les reliques ...
etc.
Notwithstanding these resemblances of «A» to «E», in passages where «A»
differs from «F», «E» cannot have been the source of «A», as there are
many instances where «E» and «F» show the same reading, whereas «A»
differs from both versions.
Thus, «A», l. 340 «et seq.», it is Duke Reyner who blesses his son, and
not Charles, as «E» and «F» (l. 357) have it.
The names of Arrenor, Gwychard, Gayot, and Angwyree, given in l. 814,
differ from those which are mentioned in the corresponding passage of
«E» and «F» (ll. 1548–49).
There is no mention of Kargys being slain by Oliver («A» 880) to be
found in «E» or «F» (l. 1670–76).
In «A» 1178, «Lamasour» advises the Soudan not to slay the prisoners;
in «E» and «F» (l. 1948) the same advice is given by «Brulans».
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account