Unidentified flying objects -- Sightings and encounters -- New Mexico -- Roswell
The two secondhand witnesses to this “crash,” Vern Maltais and Alice
Knight, could have related descriptions from any of the dummy launch
or landing sites. However, Maltais and Knight repeatedly described the
impact location of the flying saucer as on the San Agustin Plains.
One possible explanation is that the witnesses, in the 30 or more
years since they were told the story by the original eyewitness, Mr.
Barney Barnett, a soil conservation engineer who reportedly traveled
extensively throughout New Mexico, may have confused San Agustin
Plains with San Agustin Pass or San Agustin Peak, an area in the San
Agustin Mountains of New Mexico. These areas are just outside the
boundary of the White Sands Missile Range and the adjacent Jornada
Test Range. Numerous anthropomorphic dummy balloon flights terminated
and were recovered in this area. Furthermore, if the civilians
witnessed dummy landings on either the White Sands Missile Range or the
Jornada Test Range, both test areas and restricted U.S. Government
reservations, then this explains why they may have been told to leave
the landing site. In the popular Roswell scenarios, witnesses were
allegedly instructed by military personnel to leave the area because
they witnessed something of a highly classified nature. This would
be unlikely since the witnesses described projects that utilized
anthropomorphic dummies which were unclassified. It is likely, however,
that if the witnesses ventured onto one of these ranges they were
instructed to leave, not because of classified activities, but for
their own safety.
These conclusions are supported by official files, technical reports,
extensive photographic documentation, and the recollections of numerous
former and retired Air Force members and civilian employees who
conducted Projects HIGH DIVE and EXCELSIOR. The descriptions examined
here, provided by UFO theorists themselves, were so remarkably—and
redundantly—similar to these Air Force projects that the only
reasonable conclusion can be that the witnesses described these
activities. These many similarities are summarized in Table 1.1.
The next section will examine the accounts of “aliens” at the hospital
at Roswell Army Air Field. As previously stated, due to the lack of
general or detailed similarities with testimony of the two rural “crash
sites,” the hospital account was determined not to be associated with
these reports.
[Illustration: Fig. 82.]
Table 1.1
Comparison of Testimony to Actual Air Force Equipment, Vehicles, and
Procedures Used to Launch and Recover Anthropomorphic Dummies
Notes:
“Crash Site” 1—Site North of Roswell
“Crash Site” 2—Site 175 miles Northwest of Roswell
Shaded areas indicates corroboration between witnesses.
Boxed shaded areas indicates corroboration between witnesses at
different “crash” sites.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account