The Royal Exchange : $b a note on the occasion of the bicentenary of the Royal Exchange Assurance — John Shaqi
The Royal Exchange : $b a note on the occasion of the bicentenary of the Royal Exchange AssuranceMason, A. E. W. (Alfred Edward Woodley)
History
The Royal Exchange : $b a note on the occasion of the bicentenary of the Royal Exchange Assurance
Mason, A. E. W. (Alfred Edward Woodley)
Royal Exchange (London, England) -- History; Royal Exchange Assurance (Firm) -- History
The history of assurance is not a sprightly theme. It is so hedged
about with details of old ordinances, tables of mortality and specimens
of fire marks, as are enough to drive the general reader into the next
parish. The historians begin as a rule with the Phœnicians. And they
are wise. Everybody has heard of the Phœnicians and that they were the
first known traders to visit Britain from overseas. You can safely
assert that the Phœnicians practised marine insurance; and on the
other hand, you can equally safely deny that they knew anything about
assurance at all for there is no one to contradict you. There is no
evidence of any kind.
This, however, is certain. Marine assurance was the first form of
assurance practised amongst men; and, inevitably, the first form. For
the risk was evident and above all could be estimated with accuracy.
The value of the ship and the worth of its cargo were known, and a
fair reckoning could be made of the perils which were likely to be
encountered on the voyage. Probably the very first edict concerning
this practice was issued when Justinian was Emperor, in the year 533.
He limited the legal rate of interest to six per cent. in all cases
except that of “Fœnus Nauticum”; and “Fœnus Nauticum” was that early
form of marine assurance which we know by the name of Bottomry. In this
one case, interest was allowed to be exacted at the rate of twelve per
cent.
Upon the heels of Justinian, however, followed the Middle Ages, and
they wiped out Justinian’s edict and any arrangement of a similar
nature, which was to be found in any parts over which the Church ruled.
Interest upon the investment of capital was accounted as usury and an
offence against God, to be corrected by burnings and floggings, and the
other delicate persuasions of those days. We have no sure knowledge
when marine insurance was revived, but we may be fairly certain that
its revival was due to the far-sighted policy of the Hanseatic League,
which had made its merchants the great sea-carriers of the Northern
nations. The League published various sea codes during the 13th century
and consolidated them at the beginning of the 14th in an authoritative
pronouncement known as “The Laws of Wisby.” Wisby was a town on the
western side of the Isle of Gothland in the Baltic, and at that time
one of the most flourishing staple towns of the North. These Laws of
Wisby do actually for the first time mention the word Bottomry, but in
such a way as to make it clear that Bottomry had long been practised.
Bottomry was a wager. The Underwriter bet the Shipowner that his ship
with its cargo would arrive safely at its port of destination. The
great difference between Bottomry and an ordinary wager, and between
Bottomry and a modern form of assurance, was this: the Underwriter paid
the money over at once, and, if he won--that is, if a ship arrived
in safety--received his money back with the addition of the premium
agreed upon. The Shipowner, in a word, held the stakes.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account