The Ruins of the Roman City of Uriconium, at Wroxeter, near ShrewsburyWright, Thomas
History
The Ruins of the Roman City of Uriconium, at Wroxeter, near Shrewsbury
Wright, Thomas
Romans -- England -- Wroxeter; Wroxeter (England) -- Antiquities, Roman
It was at this latter period that the Roman buildings began to be
systematically destroyed. It appears that still in the twelfth century,
England was covered with the remains of Roman ruined towns and villas
standing above ground, as they are still seen, though on a larger scale,
in the countries which formed the Roman province in Northern Africa. We
have seen the superstitious feelings which prevented people approaching
these ruins in our island, and it required nothing less than the hand of
the Church to interfere and break the charm which kept the rest of
society aloof. We learn from the history of the abbots of St Alban’s,
written in the thirteenth century by Matthew Paris, that already in the
eleventh century the abbots of that great religious house had begun to
break the ruins of the Roman city of Verulamium, in order to use them as
building materials. This practice became very general in the twelfth
century, and from that time the Roman ruins were pillaged on an extensive
scale whenever a monastery or a church was to be built. The ancient city
at Wroxeter was probably one of the great quarries from which the
builders of Haughmond Abbey were supplied, and no doubt it contributed
materials to other monastic houses in this part of the country. The
church of Atcham, the adjoining parish, and that of Wroxeter itself, bear
evidence to this appropriation of building materials taken from ancient
Uriconium. At the time when this inroad was made upon the ruins, the
ground, as explained before, was already raised several feet above the
Roman floors; and the mediæval builders, finding plenty of material above
ground, cleared away the walls down to the surface of the ground as it
then existed, and sought them no further. This accounts for the
condition in which we now find these walls, that is, remaining tolerably
perfect just up to the height of what was the level of the ground, at the
time the rest was destroyed. The difference between the tops of the
walls as they now exist under ground, and the present surface of the
ground, is the accumulation of earth which has taken place since this
destruction. It was the destruction of the buildings which first caused
this accumulation, by scattering about the fragments of the plaster of
the walls and the broken tiles and stones which were not worth carrying
away. After the walls above ground disappeared, and the ground was
levelled and cleared, such accumulation went on much more slowly.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account