Country life -- England; England -- Social life and customs -- 19th century
such thing as a sheep-fold or a hurdle to be seen; the cattle and sheep
very few in number; _the farm-servants living in the farm-houses, and
very few of them_; the thrashing done by machinery and horses; _a
country without people_. This is a pretty country to take a minister
from, to govern the south of England! a pretty country to take a Lord
Chancellor from, to prattle about _poor-laws_, and about _surplus
population_! My LORD GREY has, in fact, spent his life here, and
BROUGHAM has spent his life in the inns of court, or in the botheration
of speculative books. How should either of them know any thing about the
eastern, southern, or western counties? I wish I had my dignitary, DR.
BLACK, here; I would soon make him see that he has all these number of
years been talking about the bull’s horns instead of his tail and
buttocks. Besides the indescribable pleasure of having seen NEWCASTLE,
the SHIELDSES, SUNDERLAND, DURHAM, and HEXHAM, I have now discovered the
true ground of all the errors of the Scotch _feelosophers_, with regard
to population, and with regard to poor-laws. The two countries are as
different as any things of the same nature can possibly be; that which
applies to the one does not at all apply to the other. The agricultural
counties are covered all over with parish churches, and with people
thinly distributed here and there. Only look at the two counties of
Dorset and Durham. Dorset contains 1005 square miles; Durham contains
1061 square miles. Dorset has 271 _parishes_; Durham has 75 parishes.
The population of Dorset is scattered all over the whole county; there
being no town of any magnitude in it. The population of Durham, though
larger than that of Dorset, is almost all gathered together at the
mouths of the TYNE, the WEAR, and the TEES. Northumberland has 1871
square miles; and Suffolk has 1512 square miles. Northumberland has
_eighty-eight parishes_; and Suffolk has _five hundred and ten
parishes_. So here is a county one-third part smaller than that of
Northumberland, with _six times as many villages in it_! What comparison
is there to be made between states of society so essentially different?
What rule is there, with regard to population and poor-laws, which can
apply to both cases? * * * Blind and thoughtless must that man be, who
imagines that all but _farms_ in the south are unproductive. I much
question whether, taking a strip three miles each way from the road,
coming from NEWCASTLE to ALNWICK, an equal quantity of what is called
_waste ground_ in Surrey, together with the cottages that skirt it, do
not exceed such strip of ground in point of produce. Yes; the cows,
pigs, geese, poultry, gardens, bees, and fuel that arise from these
_wastes_, far exceed, even in the capacity of sustaining people, similar
breadths of ground, distributed into these large farms, in the poorer
parts of Northumberland. I have seen not less than ten thousand geese in
one tract of common, in about six miles, going from CHOBHAM towards
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account