The Russian Army and the Japanese War, Vol. 2 (of 2): Being Historical and Critical Comments on the Military Policy and Power of Russia and on the Campaign in the Far EastKuropatkin, A. N. (Alekseĭ Nikolaevich)
History
The Russian Army and the Japanese War, Vol. 2 (of 2): Being Historical and Critical Comments on the Military Policy and Power of Russia and on the Campaign in the Far East
Kuropatkin, A. N. (Alekseĭ Nikolaevich)
Russo-Japanese War, 1904-1905
As to the attack formation adopted by the troops arriving from Russia,
the 41st Division had in particular been taught to work in very close
formation, and not taught to make use of the ground. It came from
the Vilna district, which was commanded before the war by General
Grippenberg. Our gunners also arrived at the front with only one idea
of artillery tactics—to place their batteries in the open and make use
of direct fire. For this we paid dearly in our very first fight.
CHAPTER X
REASONS FOR OUR REVERSES (_conclusion_)
Particular difficulties of the strategic situation—Defects in
organization and _personnel_—Absence of a military spirit in
the army, and lack of determination in carrying operations to a
finish—Breakdown of our organization under the strain of active
service.
It is the duty of every Headquarter Staff to work out all
possibilities, and, regardless of existing international relations, to
provide for war in every probable quarter. Accordingly, our general
line of operation in case of war with Japan had been duly drawn up in
conjunction with the staffs of the Pri-Amur and Kuan-tung districts,
and had been approved. The following is an extract from the paper
dealing with the subject:
“Taking advantage of her military position—for she will be more
ready for war than we are, and will therefore possess in the
first period of the campaign a great numerical superiority both
by sea and land—Japan can afford to define her objectives only
generally. She may (1) confine her attention to the occupation
of Korea, and not take the offensive against us (which will most
probably be the case); or (2) occupy Korea and also assume the
offensive—
(_a_) In Manchuria.
(_b_) Against Port Arthur.
(_c_) In the Southern Ussuri district (Vladivostok).
“Should Japan decide on the first alternative, then, taking
into consideration the number of reinforcements we shall need,
and the adverse conditions under which they will have to be
conveyed to the front, we shall be forced at first to allow her
to seize Korea—without retaliative action on our part, if only
she will confine herself to occupying that country, and not
develop plans against Manchuria and our territory. Should she
choose the second alternative, we should be obliged to fight,
and ought at once to make up our minds not to end the war until
we have utterly destroyed her army and fleet. In view, however,
of her numerical superiority and greater readiness during
the first period of the struggle, we shall have to assume a
generally defensive rôle. Any troops we may have within the
theatre of operations should as far as possible keep clear of
decisive actions, in order to avoid being defeated in detail
before we can concentrate in force.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account