The Russian Army and the Japanese War, Vol. 2 (of 2): Being Historical and Critical Comments on the Military Policy and Power of Russia and on the Campaign in the Far EastKuropatkin, A. N. (Alekseĭ Nikolaevich)
History
The Russian Army and the Japanese War, Vol. 2 (of 2): Being Historical and Critical Comments on the Military Policy and Power of Russia and on the Campaign in the Far East
Kuropatkin, A. N. (Alekseĭ Nikolaevich)
Russo-Japanese War, 1904-1905
“8. _Conclusion as to the Tactical Instruction of our Troops._
“Although the opinion of the generals in command of military
districts in all matters pertaining to military training
should, and do, carry great weight, yet there must be some
limit to individual action. It is impossible, for instance, to
permit each of them to train the troops in his command entirely
in accordance with his own views as to what is most important
in war; for the instruction of attack and defence should not
be carried out on entirely different lines in the different
districts. Yet this is more or less what has been done. We at
headquarters are partly to blame, owing to the delay in the
publication of the field-service manuals and the instructions
for the combined training of all arms. As an example of what I
refer to: General Dragomiroff has trained the troops under him
in the Kieff Military District to attack according to a system
of his own, of which the soundness is open to doubt. If some of
his theories are carried out in war, they will result in heavy
loss, and therefore their inculcation in peace seems entirely
wrong. His order that the skirmishers escorting artillery
should be on a line with the guns themselves would only cause
the premature silencing of the latter; and another, that the
lines of skirmishers advancing to attack should not lie down
when halted, is simply impossible of execution. When bullets
are flying, a line lies down of its own accord as soon as it
halts, and quite rightly so, as men get cover more easily when
lying than standing. And now, following General Dragomiroff’s
example, in the Vilna Military District General Grippenberg has
begun to act according to his own theories, and depart from
the textbook. In his District Orders this year,[3] in which
were published his criticisms on the work done at manœuvres, he
recommends that infantry in close order should receive cavalry
with independent fire[4] instead of with volleys. He insists,
also, that when a line is advancing by short rushes, these
rushes should begin from the flanks.
“Unfortunately, much that I saw when inspecting the troops in
the different districts and on grand manœuvres led me to the
conclusion that the tactical training, especially in command,
of officers commanding units, from regiments upwards, is
neither sound nor uniform.”
My strictures on the peace tactical training of the army were,
unfortunately, only too well confirmed during the war.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account