The Russian Campaign, April to August, 1915: Being the Second Volume of "Field Notes from the Russian Front"Washburn, Stanley
History
The Russian Campaign, April to August, 1915: Being the Second Volume of "Field Notes from the Russian Front"
Washburn, Stanley
World War, 1914-1918 -- Campaigns -- Eastern Front; World War, 1914-1918 -- Personal narratives
The last few kilometres of the road into Przemysl was alive with
Russian transport plodding into the town, but the way was singularly
free from troops of any sort. With the exception of a few Cossack
patrols and an occasional officer or orderly ploughing through the mud,
there was nothing to indicate that a large Russian army was in the
vicinity. It is possible that it has already been moved elsewhere; in
any case we saw nothing of it.
Between the outer line of forts and the Wiar river are a number of
improvised field works, all of which looked as though they could stand
a good bit of taking, but of course they were not as elaborate as the
first line. The railroad crosses the little Wiar on a steel bridge,
but the bridge now lies a tangle of steel girders in the river. It is
quite obvious that the Austrian commander destroyed his bridges west
of the town because they afforded direct communications with the lines
beyond; but the bridge over the Wiar has no military value whatsoever,
the others being gone, save to give convenient _all rail_ access to
the heart of Przemysl itself. The town was given up the next day and,
as the natural consequence of the Austrian commander’s conception of
his duty, all food supplies had to be removed from the railway trucks
at the bridge, loaded into wagons, and make the rest of the journey
into the town in that way, resulting in an absolutely unnecessary delay
in relieving the wants of the half-famished garrison within. The only
bright spot that this action presents to the unprejudiced observer
is that it necessitated the dainty, carefully-shod Austrian officers
walking three kilometres through the mud before they could embark on
the trains to take them to the points of detention for prisoners in
Russia. There cannot be the slightest doubt that the rank and file of
the garrison were actually on the verge of starvation, and that the
civilian population were not far from the same fate. As near as one can
learn the latter consisted of about 40,000 persons. I am told that
the prisoners numbered 131,000 men and some 3,600 officers, and that
perhaps 20,000 have died during the siege from wounds and disease.
This, then, makes a population at the beginning of nearly 200,000 in
a fortification which, as experts say, could have easily been held by
50,000 troops. One officer even went so far as to declare that in view
of the wonderful defensive capacity of the position 30,000 might have
made a desperate stand. The fortress was thus easily three times over
garrisoned. In other words there were perhaps at the start 150,000
mouths to feed in the army alone, when 50,000 men would have been
able to hold the position. This alone made the approach of starvation
sure and swift. The fact that in this number of men there were 3,600
officers, nine of the rank of General, indicates pretty clearly
the extent to which the garrison was over officered. Kusmanek, the
commander of the fortress, is said to have had seventy-five officers on
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account