The Russo-Japanese Conflict: Its Causes and IssuesAsakawa, Kan'ichi
History
The Russo-Japanese Conflict: Its Causes and Issues
Asakawa, Kan'ichi
Russo-Japanese War, 1904-1905; Russo-Japanese War, 1904-1905 -- Causes
Talien-wan being mainly open to foreign trade, its organization and
administration were set on a separate basis from the rest of the
Kwan-tung. At the instance of M. Witte, then the Minister of Finance, an
Imperial Order was promulgated on July 30 (August 11), 1899, ordering
that near Talien-wan a new town named Dalny should be built, which was
simultaneously declared a free port under the following conditions,
namely, that the importation and exportation of merchandise should be
allowed free of customs dues in Dalny within the limits determined, and
liable to modification, by the Minister of Finance; but that goods
imported into Russia from Dalny should pay the regular import duties in
force in the Russian Empire.[254] By the Provisional Regulations already
referred to of August 20 (September 1) of the same year, the
organization of Dalny was assigned to the Eastern Chinese Railway
Company, under the chief direction of the Minister of Finance, and its
administration was intrusted to a Prefect, to be appointed and dismissed
by Imperial orders and subordinate to the Governor of the Kwan-tung
(Articles 99 and 101).[255] It is already well known that Dalny, now
covering about 100 square versts in area, was, according to M. Witte’s
plan, intended to be the commercial terminus of the great Siberian
Railway, and eventually the mercantile outlet on the Pacific of the vast
Russian Empire. Before the war, the works at Dalny, including its large
docks and piers, had cost already nearly 20,000,000 rubles. Part of this
immense expenditure was to have been met by the income of the public
sales at auction of land-lots, held three times since 1902, in spite of
the fact that the twenty-five year lease of the territory to Russia
would hardly justify her in alienating portions of it permanently.[256]
-----
Footnote 198:
Cf. _China, No. 1 (1898)_, Nos. 1 and 15. China seems to have
requested Russia to advise Germany to reconsider her action. Later,
Russia is said to have reported that she had failed to change the mind
of the Kaiser.
Footnote 199:
Count Muravieff’s remark to Sir N. O’Conor, the British _Chargé_ at
St. Petersburg, on March 28, 1898.—_China, No. 1 (1898)_, No. 125.
Footnote 200:
Kiao-chau was occupied on November 17, three Russian war-vessels came
to Port Arthur on December 18, 1897; the German-Chinese Agreement was
concluded on March 5, the formal demand by Russia was presented about
the 7th, and granted on the 27th of the same month, 1898.
Footnote 201:
_Ibid._, pp. 42–43, Nos. 95, 96, 98, 100. It is interesting to note
that, on February 4, 1902, when negotiations were in progress between
Russia and China, the former supporting large exclusive demands made
by the Russo-Chinese Bank in Manchuria, M. Lessar, the Russian
Minister, said that his Government was merely asking for privileges
similar to those of Germany in Shan-tung.—U. S. 57th Congress, 2d
Session, _House Documents_, vol. i. p. 274.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account