The Sanskrit drama : $b in its origin, development, theory and practiceKeith, Arthur Berriedale
History
The Sanskrit drama : $b in its origin, development, theory and practice
Keith, Arthur Berriedale
Sanskrit drama -- History and criticism
na bhīto marāṇād asmi kevalaṁ dūṣitaṁ yaçaḥ
viçuddhasya hi me mṛtyuḥ putrajanmasamo bhavet.
‘I fear not death, but my honour is sullied; were that stain removed,
death would be as dear as the birth of a son.’ Admirable is his
expression of belief in Vasantasenā who may be dead:
prabhavati yadi dharmo dūṣitasyāpi me ’dya: prabalapuruṣavākyair
bhāgyadoṣāt kathaṁcit
surapatibhavanasthā yatra tatra sthitā vā: vyapanayatu kalan̄kaṁ
svasvabhāvena saiva.
‘If righteousness prevails, though to-day I am undone by the slanderous
words of one in power through my unhappy fate, may she, dwelling with
the gods above or wherever she be, by her true nature wipe out the blot
upon me.’ Sadly he apostrophizes his child deemed to be at play:
hā Rohasena na hi paçyasi me vipattim: mithyaiva nandasi
paravyasanena nityam.
‘Ah! Rohasena, since thou dost not know my plight, ever dost thou
rejoice in thy play falsely, for sorrow is in store.’
The character of Cārudatta is effectively portrayed by the Vidūṣaka:
[276]
dīnānāṁ kalpavṛkṣaḥ svaguṇaphalanataḥ sajjanānāṁ kuṭumbī
ādarçaḥ çikṣitānāṁ sucaritanikaṣaḥ çīlavelāsamudraḥ
satkartā nāvamantā puruṣaguṇanidhir dakṣiṇodārasattvo hy
ekaḥ çlāghyaḥ sa jīvaty adhikaguṇatayā cocchvasanti cānye.
‘A tree of bounty to the poor, bent down by its fruits, his virtues; a
support for all good men; a mirror of the learned, a touchstone of
virtue, an ocean that never violates its boundaries of virtue;
righteous, free from pride, a store-house of human merit, the essence
of courtesy and nobility; he gives meaning to life by the goodness
which we extol; other men merely breathe.’
The evils of poverty are forcibly depicted by Cārudatta himself: [277]
çūnyair gṛhaiḥ khalu samāḥ puruṣāḥ daridrāḥ
kūpaiç ca toyarahitais tarubhiç ca çīrṇaiḥ
yad dṛṣṭapūrvajanasaṁgamavismṛtānām
evam bhavanti viphalāḥ paritoṣakālāḥ.
‘Like empty houses, in truth, are poor men, or wells without water or
blasted trees; for fruitless are their hours of relaxation, since their
former friends forget them.’ The same idea is again expressed by the
hero: [278]
satyaṁ na me vibhavanāçakṛtāsti cintā: bhāgyakrameṇa hi dhanāni
bhavanti yānti
etat tu māṁ dahati naṣṭadhanāçrayasya: yat sauhṛdād api janāḥ
çithilībhavanti.
‘My dejection, assuredly, is not born of the mere loss of my wealth,
for with the turn of fortune’s wheel riches come and go. Nay, what
pains me is that men fail in friendship to him whose sometime wealth
has taken flight.’ The repetition of the idea becomes, indeed,
wearisome, but the ingenuity and fancy of the author are undoubted.
Love is also effectively described. The Viṭa is an admirer of
Vasantasenā and thus addresses the fleeting lady: [279]
kiṁ tvaṁ padair mama padāni viçeṣayantī
vyālīva yāsi patagendrabhayābhibhūtā?
vegād aham praviçṛtaḥ pavanaṁ nirundhyām
tvannigrahe tu varagātri na me prayatnaḥ.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account