The Sanskrit drama : $b in its origin, development, theory and practiceKeith, Arthur Berriedale
History
The Sanskrit drama : $b in its origin, development, theory and practice
Keith, Arthur Berriedale
Sanskrit drama -- History and criticism
ritual; in the former we have the use of gnomic verses to illustrate a
theme, a form of literature which is preserved through the history of
Sanskrit prose, and portions of a verse narrative. The true type,
verses used at the point of emotion, especially, therefore, to give the
vital speeches and replies, is thus not represented by any text of the
Vedic literature. Whether it ever existed at all in the sense
postulated by the theory, whether there are traces of it in the Pāli
Jātakas, or whether its existence even there is a misunderstanding, are
questions which are not in vital connexion with the origin of Sanskrit
drama, and may, therefore, here be left undiscussed. One consideration,
however, is germane; if it were necessary to explain the Vedic
dialogues by this theory, it would certainly be possible to do so far
more effectively and simply than by the theory of their being the
remains of ritual dramas. The most serious objection to both theories
is that they are not really necessary. Professor Geldner [21] who
formerly patronized the theory of Oldenberg has sought to explain the
hymns in question as ballads. [22]
Nor of course is it necessary to make any use of this theory in order
to explain the mixture of prose and verse in the Sanskrit drama. The
use of prose needs no defence or explanation; that of verse is what was
essentially to be expected, in view of the importance of song as a form
of amusement as well as in worship both in Vedic times and later, and
of the fact that our extant dramas draw so largely on epic tradition,
preserved in versified texts. Nothing indeed is more noteworthy in
Sanskrit literature than the determination to turn everything, law,
astronomy, architecture, rhetoric, even philosophy into a metrical
form. The theorists on the drama give no suggestion that the prose was
regarded as any less fixed in character than the verses, or that it was
not the duty of the author of the drama to be as careful in preparing
the one as the other, and the manuscript tradition of the drama does
not hint at any distinction of the two elements as regards source.
3. DRAMATIC ELEMENTS IN VEDIC RITUAL
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account