The Sanskrit drama : $b in its origin, development, theory and practiceKeith, Arthur Berriedale
History
The Sanskrit drama : $b in its origin, development, theory and practice
Keith, Arthur Berriedale
Sanskrit drama -- History and criticism
by a voice from heaven and can only bid Kṛpa lend his aid.
In Act IV Duryodhana is brought in wounded; recovering, he learns of
Duḥçāsana’s death and a Kuru disaster; a messenger from Karṇa tells in
a long Prākrit speech of the death of Karṇa’s son, and gives an appeal
for aid written in Karṇa’s blood. Duryodhana makes ready for battle,
but is interrupted by the arrival of his parents, Dhṛtarāṣṭra and
Gāndhārī with Sañjaya, whose advent begins Act V. The aged couple and
Sañjaya urge in vain Duryodhana to peace; he refuses, and again,
hearing of Karṇa’s death, unaided, is ready to part for the field, when
Arjuna and Bhīma appear; Bhīma insists on their saluting with insults
their uncle; Duryodhana reproves them, but Arjuna insists that it is
just retribution for the acquiescence of the aged king in Draupadī’s
ill-treatment. Duryodhana defies Bhīma, who would fight, but Arjuna
forbids, and Yudhiṣṭhira’s summons takes them away. Açvatthāman
arrives, and seeks reconciliation with Duryodhana, who receives him
coldly; he withdraws, followed by Sañjaya, bidden by Dhṛtarāṣṭra to
appease him.
Act VI tells us from an announcement to Yudhiṣṭhira and Draupadī of
Duryodhana’s death at Bhīma’s hands. But a Cārvāka comes in, who tells
a very different story; Bhīma and Arjuna are dead. Yudhiṣṭhira and
Draupadī resolve on death, and the Cārvāka, who is really a Rākṣasa,
departs in glee. When, however, they are about to die, a noise is
heard; Yudhiṣṭhira, deeming it Duryodhana, rushes to arms, while
Draupadī runs away, and is caught by her hair by Bhīma, whom
Yudhiṣṭhira seizes. The ludicrous error is discovered, and Draupadī
binds up at last her locks. Arjuna and Vāsudeva arrive, the Cārvāka has
been slain by Nakula, and all is well.
The play is on the whole undramatic, for the action is choked by
narrative, and the vast abundance of detail served up in this form
confuses and destroys interest. Yet the characterization is good;
Duryodhana, as in the later Indian tradition, is unlovable; he is proud
and arrogant, self-confident, vain, and selfish; he laughs at
Bhānumatī’s fears and has no sympathy for the maternal anxiety of
Jayadratha’s mother. He is suspicious of Droṇa and Açvatthāman, and
thus deprives himself of their effective aid; Karṇa, whose jealous
advice he accepts, he leaves to perish. Bhīma again is a bloodthirsty
and boastful bully; Arjuna is equally valiant, but he is less an
undisciplined savage, while Kṛṣṇa intervenes with wise moderation.
Yudhiṣṭhira is, as ever, grave and more concerned with the interest of
his subjects than his personal feelings. Horror and pathos are not
lacking, but the love interest is certainly not effective, and it may
be that it was forced on the author by tradition rather than any
thought of producing a real interest of itself. Bhaṭṭa Nārāyaṇa’s
slavish fidelity to rule brought him censure even from Indian critics.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account