The Sanskrit drama : $b in its origin, development, theory and practiceKeith, Arthur Berriedale
History
The Sanskrit drama : $b in its origin, development, theory and practice
Keith, Arthur Berriedale
Sanskrit drama -- History and criticism
The grand manner is appropriate to the sentiments of heroism, wonder,
and fury, and in a less degree to the pathetic and erotic. Virtue,
courage, self-sacrifice, compassion, and righteousness are its
subjects, not sorrow. Its divisions are the challenge (utthāpaka), as
in the Mahāvīracarita, Act V, Vālin defies Rāma; breach of alliance
(saṁghātya) among one’s foes, which may be brought about by deliberate
stratagem, as in the Mudrārākṣasa, or by fate, as in the Rāma dramas
Vibhīṣaṇa severs himself from Rāvaṇa; change of action (parivartaka) as
when in the Mahāvīracarita Paraçurāma offers to embrace Rāma, whom he
came to overthrow; and the dialogue (saṁlāpa) of warriors such as that
of Rāma and Paraçurāma in the same play.
The violent manner accords with the sentiments of fury, horror, and
terror. It employs magic, conjuration, conflicts, rage, fury, and
underhand devices. Its elements include, first, the almost immediate
construction (saṁkṣipti) of some object by artificial means, such as
the elephant of mats made to contain Udayana’s men in the lost
Udayanacarita; but others interpret this member as a sudden change of
hero, whether real, as in the substitution of Vālin for Sugrīva, or
merely a change of heart on the hero’s part, as in Paraçurāma’s
submission to Rāma; in either case only a secondary hero can change or
be changed, else the unity of the drama would disappear. The other
elements are the creation of an object by magic means (vastūtthāpana);
the angry meeting of two persons who end by fighting (sampheṭa), as do
Mādhava and Aghoraghaṇṭa in the Mālatīmādhava; and a scene of
tumultuous disturbance (avapāta), such as that when the monkey escapes
in the Ratnāvalī or of the attack on Vindhyaketu in the Priyadarçikā,
Act I.
The verbal manner is based on sound, as the other three are on sense.
The voice only is its means of expression; women may not use it, and
the men must speak Sanskrit; these actors bear the name Bharata, which
is appropriated to this manner. It is adapted to all the sentiments,
or, according to the Nāṭyaçāstra, only to those of heroism, wonder, and
fury. Its elements are, in true scholastic fashion, likewise reckoned
as four; two of them, the propitiation (prarocanā), and the
introduction (āmukha, prastāvanā), essentially belong to the prologue
of the drama, and will be considered in that connexion; the other two
are given as the garland (vīthī) and the farce, which are species of
drama. But the theorists agree that the elements (an̄ga) of the garland
[693] are applicable in any part of the drama, especially the first
juncture, and they are evidently an essential part of the verbal
manner.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account