[Footnote 129: See Ind. Studien, i. 301.] [Footnote 130: The mind or internal sense perceives soul (see Bháshá Parichchheda, śloka 49).] [Footnote 131: Delete the _iti_ in p. 84, line 5, _infra_.] [Footnote 132: Cf. the Nakulíśa Páśupatas, p. 76, 4 (_supra_, p. 103).] [Footnote 133: For these three classes see J. A. O. S. iv. pp. 87, 137. They are there described as being respectively under the influence of _áṇavam malam_ only, or this with _kanmam malam_, or these with _mayei malam_. The _áṇavam_ is described as original sin, or that source of evil which was always attached to the soul; _kanmam_ is that fate which inheres in the soul's organism and metes out its deserts; _mayei_ is matter in its obscuring or entangling power, the source of the senses. Mádhava uses "_kalá_," &c., for _máyá_. The reason is to be found in J. A. O. S. p. 70, where it is said that the five _vidyátattvas_ (_kalá_, _vidyá_, _rága_, _niyati_, and _kalá_) and the twenty-four _átmatattvas_ (_sc._ the gross and subtile elements, and organs of sense and action, with the intellectual faculties _manas_, _buddhi_, _ahaṃkára_, and _chitta_), are all developed from _máyá_. This exactly agrees with the quotation from Soma Śambhu, _infra_. We may compare with it what Mádhava says, p. 77, in his account of the Nakulíśa Páśupatas, where he describes _kalá_ as unintelligent, and composed of the five elements, the five _tanmátras_, and the ten organs, with _buddhi_, _ahaṃkára_ and _manas_.] [Footnote 134: See J. A. O. S. iv. p. 137. I read _anugrahakaraṇát_ in p. 86, line 3.] [Footnote 135: I omit the quotation, as it only repeats the preceding. It, however, names the three classes as _vijñána-kevala_, _pralaya-kevala_, and _sakala_.] [Footnote 136: _I.e._, thus including five of the _vidyátattvas_ and all the twenty-four _átmatattvas_.] [Footnote 137: This term seems to be derived from _purí_, "body" (cf. _puriśaya_ for _purusha_, Bṛihad Ár. Up. ii. 5, 18), and _ashṭaka_ (cf. also the Sánkhya Pravachana Bháshya, p. 135).] [Footnote 138: Or rather thirty-one?] [Footnote 139: _Manas_, _buddhi_, _ahaṃkára_, _chitta_.] [Footnote 140: These are the seven _viḍyá-tattvas_, _kalá_, _kála_, _niyati_ (fate), _vidyá_, _rága_, _prakṛiti_, and _guṇa_. Hoisington, however, puts _purushan_ "the principle of life," instead of _guṇa_, which seems better, as the three _guṇas_ are included in _prakṛiti_. He translates _kalá_ by "continency," and describes it as "the power by which the senses are subdued and the carnal self brought into subjection."] [Footnote 141: This "instrument" (_karaṇa_) seems to mean what Hoisington calls _purushan_ or "the principle of life which establishes or supports the whole system in its operation;" he makes it one of the seven _vidyátattvas_. According to Mádhava, it should be what he calls _guṇa_.]