The Saxons in England, Volume 1 (of 2): A history of the English commonwealth till the period of the Norman conquestKemble, John Mitchell
History
The Saxons in England, Volume 1 (of 2): A history of the English commonwealth till the period of the Norman conquest
Kemble, John Mitchell
Great Britain -- History -- Anglo-Saxon period, 449-1066
It is with no disrespect to the unrivalled powers of Scott that I
enter my protest here against the false _costume_ of Ivanhoe; a far
more serious objection no doubt is the way in which his brilliant
contrast, necessary to the success of a romance, has misled the
historian. Had Ivanhoe not appeared, we should not have had the many
errors which disfigure Thierry’s Conquête de l'Angleterre par les
Normands. But when Scott makes Ulrica (Ulrica a Saxon female name!)
calling upon Zernebock, as a god of her forefathers, he makes her talk
absolute nonsense. Some Mecklenburg or Pomeranian Saxons, in the
immediate neighbourhood of Slavonic populations, or mingled with them,
may possibly have heard of _their_ god Czerny Bog, (_the black god_)
contrasted with Bjala Bog, (_the white god_), but assuredly no
Anglosaxon ever heard the name of any such deity; nor does the chaunt
of the vindictive lady bear one single trace of Saxon character. In
every matter of detail, the romance is only calculated to mislead; and
this is to be regretted, inasmuch as the beauty of the whole work
renders it a certain vehicle of error;—has rendered it already a snare
to one estimable author. M. Thierry has related the effect produced
upon his mind by Ivanhoe. See his Dix Ans d'Études Historiques:
Preface.
Footnote 700:
Deut. Myth. p. 227.
Footnote 701:
See Salomon and Saturn, p. 129.
-----
From the Gods we pass to the Goddesses: of these we have indeed but
scanty record in England. Of the great and venerable goddess Fricge,
Wóden’s wife, we are only told that she gave her name to the sixth day
of the week; and we must admit that this is all we know of her, unless
she be implied under some other name, which is possible.
Beda in acquainting us with the ancient names of the Anglosaxon months
tells us of four which were called from their especial reference to the
gods: these are Solmónað or February; Hréðmónað, March; Eóstermónað,
April; and Blótmónað, November. Solmónað he says received its name from
the cakes which were offered to the gods at that time[702]; Blótmónað
from the victims (cattle) that were vowed for sacrifice; of the others
he says[703], “Hréðmónað is called from a goddess of theirs,—Rheda, to
whom they sacrificed in that month. Eóstermónað, which is now
interpreted by the ‘Paschal month,’ had its name of old from a goddess
of theirs named Eostre, to whom in this month they offered
celebrations.”
-----
Footnote 702:
Can this word _sol_ (perhaps _sól_) be a contracted form of _sufl_? If
not, I cannot offer an explanation of it.
Footnote 703:
De Natura Rerum, cap. xv.
-----
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account