This last infirmity one can understand and forgive. It grows out of an
officer's attachment to his men. It is present sometimes in the British
officers who command Gurkhas. Indeed, a man who after a year's service
with any class of Sepoy is so detached and impartial in mind as not to
find peculiar and distinctive virtues in his own men, ought not to be
serving in the Indian Army at all. I remember once hearing a subaltern
in a very obscure regiment discussing his class company. The battalion
had not seen service for at least three generations, and everyone took
it for granted that they would "rat" the first time they heard a shot
fired. But the boy was full of "bukh."
"By Jove!" he said, "our fellows are simply splendid, the best plucked
crowd in the Indian Army, and so game.... Oh no! they've never been in
action, but you should just see how they lay one another out at hockey."
Before the war one would have smiled inwardly at this "encomium," if one
could have preserved one's outward countenance, but Armageddon, the
corrective of exclusiveness and pride, has taught us that gallantry
resides under the most unlikely exteriors. It has taught us to look for
it there. Anyhow the boy had the right spirit even if his faith were
founded in illusion; for it is through these ties of mutual loyalty that
the spirit of the Indian Army is strong.
The devotion of the Sepoy to his officer is common to most, perhaps to
all, classes of the Indian Army. In some of the Gurkha battalions it is
usual for two of the men to mark their Sahib when he goes into action,
to follow him closely, and if he falls, to look after him and bring him
back whether wounded or dead. This is a tacitly understood and quite
unofficial arrangement, and the officer knows no more about his
self-appointed guard than the hero or villain of melodrama about the
detective who dogs his footsteps in the street. In France a British
officer in a Gurkha regiment knocked out by shell-shock opened his eyes
to find his orderly kneeling over him fanning the flies off his face. He
lost consciousness again. When he came to the Gurkha was still fanning
him, and the tears were rolling down his cheeks.
"Why are you crying, 'Tegh Bahadur?'" he said; "I am not badly hit."
"I am crying, Sahib," he said, "because my arm is gone, and I am no more
able to fight." And with a nod he indicated the wound. The shell that
had stunned the Sahib had carried off the orderly's forearm at the
elbow.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account