The Sermon on the Mount: A Practical ExpositionGore, Charles
Religion
The Sermon on the Mount: A Practical Exposition
Gore, Charles
Sermon on the mount
2. Secondly, we may notice that this requirement of self-effacement is
of the nature of an ascetic prescription, as when our Lord said “If thy
right eye offend thee, pluck it out; if thy right hand offend thee, cut
it off.” The necessity for this self-mutilation――cutting off a hand,
plucking out an eye――lay in the fact that these limbs, or faculties,
or functions of our nature had been so utterly misused that before
they could be again used legitimately they must be put under this stern
discipline of effacement.
So with this instinct of revenge. The instinct has in it something that
is right: something of the passion of justice. It is a true instinct
which makes us feel that for wrong done man should suffer wrong. It
is derived from the divine principle of justice. But in our own cases,
where our own interests are concerned, this passion of justice has come
to be so mixed up with selfishness, and with those excessive demands
which spring of selfishness――in a word, it has become so defiled with
sin――that our Lord imposes on it an absolute ban; He says “Vengeance
is mine, I will repay, saith the Lord.” He takes away from us, as
it were, the right to administer justice in our own case. “The wrath
of man worketh not the righteousness of God.”[51] He requires us as
individuals to acknowledge the law of self-effacement.
3. The requirement which our Lord lays on His disciples is not only
made in words. It was enforced, where the enforcement is most striking,
in our Lord’s example. You watch our Lord in His passion; and when
you look delicately and accurately at the details of the treatment He
received, you observe how almost intolerably hard to bear were many
of His trials. We can hardly conceive what to Him it must have been to
bear the hideous insults and injustices of men. Think for example, to
take a subtle but impressive instance,[52] of those false accusations
brought against Him which had in them the sound of truth. “And there
stood up certain, and bear false witness against him, saying, We heard
him say, I will destroy this temple that is made with hands, and in
three days I will build another made without hands.”[53] He had said in
fact not that, but something like it. He had said “Destroy this temple,
and in three days I will raise it up.”[54] That is, Suppose you destroy,
then I will rebuild. There was a great difference between what He had
said and what He was accused of saying. But you know in what atmosphere
it is that such accusations are brought. The crowd does not consider
details; it listens to the vague sound of the words; it is easily
convinced: “He said something of that sort. If he defends himself, he
has to quibble.” And thus they rush off and put down to the accused man
not what he said, but what he was supposed to have said. Now our Lord
had that delicate instinct of the pastor. He knew there were people
watching Him, and wondering whether He were the true Messiah or no. To
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account