The seven books of Paulus Ægineta, volume 1 (of 3) : $b translated from the Greek: with a commentary embracing a complete view of the knowledge possessed by the Greeks, Romans, and Arabians on all subjects connected with medicine and surgeryPaulus, Aegineta
History
The seven books of Paulus Ægineta, volume 1 (of 3) : $b translated from the Greek: with a commentary embracing a complete view of the knowledge possessed by the Greeks, Romans, and Arabians on all subjects connected with medicine and surgery
Paulus, Aegineta
Medicine; Medicine, Arab; Medicine, Greek and Roman
COMMENTARY. This Section is taken from Oribasius (Synops. vi, 44.)
Aëtius remarks that, in prolonged fevers, the fleshy parts of the body
being wasted, ulceration takes place in those parts upon which the
patient lies. These sores, he adds, spread deep, and have hard thick
edges. When the back becomes red and painful, he directs us to surround
the adjoining parts with a circle of wool, so as to relieve the affected
part from the effects of pressure; and then a cerate of rose or myrtle
oil, containing litharge, ceruse, and burnt barley is to be applied. He
particularly commends a composition consisting of litharge, oil, wax, and
honey, mixed with rose-oil. In short, his plan of treatment, like our
author’s, is borrowed from Oribasius. He concludes with directing the
use of milder applications when the ulceration has stopped spreading. (v,
127.)
Alsaharavius directs us to treat the redness of the back occasioned by
lying long in bed with the flower of millet, barley, or lentils. When
pustules form and break, he recommends an ointment containing ceruse to
be applied. (Pract. xxix, 1, 26.)
_Appendix to the Commentary on Book Second._
ON SMALLPOX AND MEASLES.
The reader, we are sure, would be disappointed, if we were to quit the
subject of Fever without touching upon the history of Smallpox and
Measles. We will, therefore, conformably with our general plan, give a
brief abstract of the descriptions of these diseases which we meet with
in the works of the ancient physicians. In the first place, then, we may
mention that, after having read, we may say, every word of every ancient
writer on medicine that has come down to us, we can confidently affirm
that the Greeks and Romans are altogether silent on the subject, and that
we are indebted to the Arabians for the earliest accounts which we have
of these diseases. Rhases, indeed, pretends (provided the Introduction to
his ‘Treatise on Smallpox’ be not spurious) that Galen had delivered some
imperfect descriptions of smallpox; but he would appear to have been led
into this mistake by following some inaccurate translation of the works
of Galen into the Syriac language; for no passages which would justify
the interpretation which Rhases puts upon them are now to be found in the
original. Lately, Dr. Bateman attempted to show that allusions to measles
and smallpox are to be met with in the works of several of the Greek
authors; but we entirely agree with Drs. Mead and Freind, who maintain
the contrary. In an Arabian MS. preserved in the University of Leyden, it
is stated that the smallpox and measles first appeared in Arabia about
the year 572, P.C. See Reiske (Opuscula Medica, p. 10.)
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account