The seven books of Paulus Ægineta, volume 2 (of 3) : $b translated from the Greek: with a commentary embracing a complete view of the knowledge possessed by the Greeks, Romans, and Arabians on all subjects connected with medicine and surgery — John Shaqi
The seven books of Paulus Ægineta, volume 2 (of 3) : $b translated from the Greek: with a commentary embracing a complete view of the knowledge possessed by the Greeks, Romans, and Arabians on all subjects connected with medicine and surgeryPaulus, Aegineta
History
The seven books of Paulus Ægineta, volume 2 (of 3) : $b translated from the Greek: with a commentary embracing a complete view of the knowledge possessed by the Greeks, Romans, and Arabians on all subjects connected with medicine and surgery
Paulus, Aegineta
Medicine; Medicine, Arab; Medicine, Greek and Roman
Hippocrates makes only casual mention of these diseases, and has nowhere
marked their distinguishing characters. In one place he calls leprosy
a blemish rather than a disease; and in another he remarks that some
varieties of it itch before rain. He speaks of vinegar, and of lime and
water as remedies for it. It is proper to apprize the reader that the two
works quoted above from the Hippocratic Collection are, most probably,
not genuine.
Galen also is very deficient on the subject of lepra, having nowhere
given a complete description of it, although he notices it incidentally
in many parts of his works. In one place he calls elephas, leuce, and
alphos cognate affections. Alphos, he says, is much more superficial than
leuce. In another, he attributes these complaints to the melancholic
humour which becomes fixed in the skin. In the ‘Isagogue,’ which,
however, seems not to be a genuine work of his, it is said that lepra is
an affection of the skin, which becomes whiter and rougher than natural,
the roughness resembling that from prominent psydracia. Psora is said to
partake more of the nature of ulceration. Both are represented as arising
from a saltish phlegm, and as being cured by phlegmagogues, and ointments
rubbed into the skin. It is also stated that leuce is distinguished from
lepra by there being no roughness of the skin in the former disease. In
another place he mentions psora as a disease most inveterate to cure.
(Facult. Natur. i, 13.)
Oribasius thus distinguishes leuce, alphos, melas, lepra, and psora
from one another. Leuce is occasioned by a pituitous and viscid blood,
which, in process of time, renders the colour white. Alphos arises in
like manner, but the superficial skin only is affected, and not the whole
flesh. When a pituitous humour is the cause of the complaint, it puts
on the appearance of alphos, and when the melancholic, of melas. Lepra
affects mostly the deep-seated parts, and psora the superficial. For all
these complaints he recommends a mixture of lime and water and some other
such things.
In the ‘Euporista,’ generally ascribed to Dioscorides, there is given a
long list of medicinal articles for lepra, such as the flour of darnel
with sulphur, hellebore with vinegar, verdigris, cantharides, &c.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account