The seven books of Paulus Ægineta, volume 3 (of 3) : $b translated from the Greek: with a commentary embracing a complete view of the knowledge possessed by the Greeks, Romans, and Arabians on all subjects connected with medicine and surgeryPaulus, Aegineta
Science
The seven books of Paulus Ægineta, volume 3 (of 3) : $b translated from the Greek: with a commentary embracing a complete view of the knowledge possessed by the Greeks, Romans, and Arabians on all subjects connected with medicine and surgery
Paulus, Aegineta
Medicine; Medicine, Arab; Medicine, Greek and Roman
COMMENTARY. The herb is not described by Dioscorides, Theophrastus, or
Pliny. It would appear to be the same as the _Erinus_, which see. The
Ἐ. χερσᾶιος is undoubtedly the _Hystrix Cristata_, and the Ἐ. θαλάττιος
the _Echinus Esculentus_. Dioscorides and Galen give the same account
of their medicinal properties as our author. Serapion, after giving the
description by Dioscorides and Galen, adds, from an Arabian authority,
that the flesh of the land echinus is beneficial in protracted fevers.
(De Simpl. 435.) Avicenna (ii, 2, 234,) treats of the two echini at
greater length than any other ancient author, recommending the flesh of
the land, in phthisis, dropsy, elephantia, scabies, scrofula, and other
complaints of a formidable nature. Upon the whole, however, his account
of it is mostly made up of extracts from Dioscorides and Galen. See in
like manner Rhases (Cont. l. ult. i, 273.) He recommends the land echinus
in the irretention of urine to which children are subject, adding that
when frequently administered, it brings on dysuria. He and Avicenna quote
Serapion as an authority for its use in protracted fevers. Both the
echini disappeared from our Dispensatory a considerable time ago.
Ἔχιον,
Echium, _Viper’s Bugloss_, (some call it also _Dorias_, and others
_Alcibiadium_,) is a prickly herb, which not only relieves those who have
been bitten by reptiles when drunk in wine, but, if taken beforehand, it
preserves them from being injured.
* * * * *
COMMENTARY. It appears to us quite clear that this article is the _Echium
vulgare_ or Viper’s Bugloss, which we have no doubt was introduced
into Britain with other medicinal herbs by the Romans, for it is never
found remote from cultivated places, and therefore we believe it not to
be truly indigenous. Some have taken it for the _Echium rubrum_, from
Dioscorides having described the flowers as being _purplish_, whereas,
purplish signifies a bright blue, and not red as is supposed. Parkinson
thus describes the colour of the flowers of the _Echium vulgare_:
“The flowers are of a purplish violet colour, in them that are fully
blown, but more reddish while they are in bud; but in some places of
a paler purple colour,” &c. (p. 413.) We, then, have no hesitation in
acknowledging it as the _Echium vulgare_. Our author borrows his account
of its medicinal powers from Dioscorides. (iv, 27.) The Arabians would
seem to confound it with the Anchusæ, to which it is closely allied. Our
old herbalists, in treating of the viper’s bugloss, follow Dioscorides;
but it has long ceased to hold a place in our Dispensatory. It still,
however, is known in the shops, where its root retains the character of
being aperient and slightly astringent. See Gray (Suppl. to Pharmacop. p.
54.)
Ἕψημα ἢ σίραιον,
Defrutum, _Boiled Must_; it is moderately heating and digestive, and is
also emplastic and free from pungency.
* * * * *
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account