The Siberian Overland Route from Peking to Petersburg,: Through the Deserts and Steppes of Mongolia, Tartary, &c.Michie, Alexander
History
The Siberian Overland Route from Peking to Petersburg,: Through the Deserts and Steppes of Mongolia, Tartary, &c.
Michie, Alexander
China -- Description and travel; Siberia (Russia) -- Description and travel
A project for improving the water communication in Siberia was set
on foot by an enterprising Russian in 1859. The scheme was revived
in 1862, and the projector was supported by a Hamburg banker, and
assisted by a Russian colonel of engineers. Their intention was
to form a complete water route from Tumen to Kiachta, first by
the rivers Ob, Tom, Tchulim and Ket. From the last-named, a canal
thirty to thirty-five miles in length would have to be cut into the
river Yenisei. From the Yenisei, the Angara would be used to its
source in the Baikal lake. From the lake the route would be up the
Selenga to a point about eighteen miles from Kiachta. Thus, by one
cutting, of, at the most, thirty-five miles, clear and uninterrupted
water conveyance would be established from near the Ural mountains
to the frontier of China. But the difficulties in the way of this
enterprise are very serious. The river Angara is, in its present
state, not navigable except down stream. In a distance of 800
miles below Irkutsk, there are no less than seventy-eight rapids
and dangerous passes, some of which it would be impossible even
for a steamer to ascend. Native craft shoot the rapids when the
water is high, and effect a passage down the river, but of course
never return. To render that part of the river fit for navigation,
rocks would have to be blasted and cleared away. Above Irkutsk
also, there are one or two places on the Angara that would have
to be cleared before the steamers could ply with safety on the
river. But supposing all that accomplished, to carry out the water
communication with efficiency, steamers of various classes suited
to the depth of water, and the nature of the different rivers,
would be necessary, thereby adding greatly to the expense. On the
whole, the cost of clearing out the channel of the Angara, and other
minor items of expense, would be so enormous that it is highly
improbable the scheme will ever be carried out; certainly not for
some generations to come. All that can now be done is to improve the
water communication at present in use in so far as steam traffic is
practicable. Before the Angara is cleared of rocks, railways will
probably traverse Siberia. Not that I consider the construction
of railways in that region nearer than a remote possibility. For,
although Siberia would be no exception to the general rule that
railways make traffic for themselves, yet the cost must bear some
proportion to the return. The length of railway necessary to connect
the traffic of the various distant parts would be enormous, and as
these matters are managed in Russia, would probably cost three times
the amount that would be required in any other country. There is no
capital in Russia available for such a purpose, and foreign capital
will find many more attractive investments than Siberian railways.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account