The six books of Proclus, the Platonic successor, on the theology of Plato (vol. 1 of 2) : $b translated from the Greek, to which a seventh book is added, in order to supply the deficiency of another book on this subject, which was written by Proclus, but since lost, also, a translation from the Greek of Proclus' Elements of theology, to which are added a translation of the treatise of Proclus, On providence and fate, a translation of extracts from his treatise, entitled, Ten doubts concerning — John Shaqi
The six books of Proclus, the Platonic successor, on the theology of Plato (vol. 1 of 2) : $b translated from the Greek, to which a seventh book is added, in order to supply the deficiency of another book on this subject, which was written by Proclus, but since lost, also, a translation from the Greek of Proclus' Elements of theology, to which are added a translation of the treatise of Proclus, On providence and fate, a translation of extracts from his treatise, entitled, Ten doubts concerning Proclus
Philosophy
The six books of Proclus, the Platonic successor, on the theology of Plato (vol. 1 of 2) : $b translated from the Greek, to which a seventh book is added, in order to supply the deficiency of another book on this subject, which was written by Proclus, but since lost, also, a translation from the Greek of Proclus' Elements of theology, to which are added a translation of the treatise of Proclus, On providence and fate, a translation of extracts from his treatise, entitled, Ten doubts concerning
Proclus
Neoplatonism -- Early works to 1800; Plato -- Early works to 1800; Theology -- Early works to 1800
In his seventh epistle also he observes as follows: “Thus much,
however, I shall say respecting all those who either have written
or shall write, affirming that they know those things which are the
objects of my study (whether they have heard them from me or from
others, or whether they have discovered them themselves) that they have
not heard any thing about these things conformable to my opinion: for
I never have written nor ever shall write about them.[53] For a thing
of this kind cannot be expressed by words like other disciplines, but
by long familiarity, and living in conjunction with the thing itself, a
light[54] as it were leaping from a fire will on a sudden be enkindled
in the soul, and there itself nourish itself.” And shortly after he
adds; “But if it appeared to me that the particulars of which I am
speaking could be sufficiently communicated to the _multitude_ by
writing or speech, what could we accomplish more beautiful in life than
to impart a mighty benefit to mankind, and lead an intelligible nature
into light, so as to be obvious to all men? I think, however, that an
attempt of this kind would only be beneficial to a few, who from some
small vestiges previously demonstrated are themselves able to discover
these abstruse particulars. But with respect to the rest of mankind,
some it will fill with a contempt by no means elegant, and others with
a lofty and arrogant hope that they shall now learn certain venerable
things.”[55]
The prediction of Plato therefore, has been but too truly fulfilled in
the fate which has attended the writings of the best of his disciples,
among whom Proclus certainly maintains the most distinguished rank.
This indeed, these disciples well knew would be the case; but
perceiving that the hand of Barbaric and despotic power was about
to destroy the schools of the philosophers, and foreseeing that
dreadful night of ignorance and folly which succeeded so nefarious
an undertaking, they benevolently disclosed in as luminous a manner
as the subject would permit, the arcana of their master’s doctrines,
thereby, as Plato expresses it, giving assistance to Philosophy, and
also preserving it as a paternal and immortal inheritance, to the
latest posterity. Proclus in the first book of this work has enumerated
the requisites which a student of it ought to possess; and it is most
certain that he who does not possess them, will never fathom the depths
of this theology, or perceive his mind irradiated with that admirable
light, mentioned by Plato in the foregoing extract, and which is only
to be seen by that eye of the soul which is better worth saving than
ten thousand corporeal eyes.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account