The six books of Proclus, the Platonic successor, on the theology of Plato (vol. 1 of 2) : $b translated from the Greek, to which a seventh book is added, in order to supply the deficiency of another book on this subject, which was written by Proclus, but since lost, also, a translation from the Greek of Proclus' Elements of theology, to which are added a translation of the treatise of Proclus, On providence and fate, a translation of extracts from his treatise, entitled, Ten doubts concerning — John Shaqi
The six books of Proclus, the Platonic successor, on the theology of Plato (vol. 1 of 2) : $b translated from the Greek, to which a seventh book is added, in order to supply the deficiency of another book on this subject, which was written by Proclus, but since lost, also, a translation from the Greek of Proclus' Elements of theology, to which are added a translation of the treatise of Proclus, On providence and fate, a translation of extracts from his treatise, entitled, Ten doubts concerning Proclus
Philosophy
The six books of Proclus, the Platonic successor, on the theology of Plato (vol. 1 of 2) : $b translated from the Greek, to which a seventh book is added, in order to supply the deficiency of another book on this subject, which was written by Proclus, but since lost, also, a translation from the Greek of Proclus' Elements of theology, to which are added a translation of the treatise of Proclus, On providence and fate, a translation of extracts from his treatise, entitled, Ten doubts concerning
Proclus
Neoplatonism -- Early works to 1800; Plato -- Early works to 1800; Theology -- Early works to 1800
With respect to the diction of Proclus in this work, its general
character is that of purity, clearness, copiousness, and magnificence;
so that even the fastidious critic, who considers every Greek writer as
partially barbarous who lived after the fall of the Macedonian empire,
must, however unwillingly, be forced to acknowledge that Proclus is
a splendid exception. The sagacious Kepler, whose decision on this
subject, outweighs in my opinion, that of a swarm of modern critics,
after having made a long extract from the commentaries of Proclus on
Euclid, gives the following animated encomium of his diction. “Oratio
fluit ipsi torrentis instar, ripas inundans, et cœca dubitationum
vada gurgitesque occultans, dum mens plena majestatis tantarum rerum,
luctatur in angustiis linguæ, et conclusio nunquam sibi ipsi verborum
copiâ satisfaciens, propositionum simplicitatem excedit.” i.e. “His
language flows like a torrent, inundating its banks, and hiding the
dark fords and whirlpools of doubts, while his mind full of the majesty
of things of such a magnitude, struggles in the straits of language,
and the conclusion never satisfying him, exceeds by the copia of
words, the simplicity of the propositions.” If we omit what Kepler
here says about the struggle of the mind of Proclus, and his never
being satisfied with the conclusion, the rest of his eulogy is equally
applicable to the style of the present work, so far as it is possible
for the beauties of diction to be combined with the rigid accuracy of
geometrical reasoning.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account