The social contract & discoursesRousseau, Jean-Jacques
Philosophy
The social contract & discourses
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques
Economics; Political science -- Early works to 1800; Social contract
But who does not see, without recurring to the uncertain testimony
of history, that everything seems to remove from savage man both the
temptation and the means of changing his condition? His imagination
paints no pictures; his heart makes no demands on him. His few wants
are so readily supplied, and he is so far from having the knowledge
which is needful to make him want more, that he can have neither
foresight nor curiosity. The face of nature becomes indifferent to
him as it grows familiar. He sees in it always the same order, the
same successions: he has not understanding enough to wonder at the
greatest miracles; nor is it in his mind that we can expect to find
that philosophy man needs, if he is to know how to notice for once what
he sees every day. His soul, which nothing disturbs, is wholly wrapped
up in the feeling of its present existence, without any idea of the
future, however near at hand; while his projects, as limited as his
views, hardly extend to the close of day. Such, even at present, is the
extent of the native Caribean's foresight: he will improvidently sell
you his cotton-bed in the morning, and come crying in the evening to
buy it again, not having foreseen he would want it again the next night.
The more we reflect on this subject, the greater appears the distance
between pure sensation and the most simple knowledge: it is impossible
indeed to conceive how a man, by his own powers alone, without the aid
of communication and the spur of necessity, could have bridged so great
a gap. How many ages may have elapsed before mankind were in a position
to behold any other Are than that of the heavens. What a multiplicity
of chances must have happened to teach them the commonest uses of that
element! How often must they have let it out before they acquired the
art of reproducing it? and how often may not such a secret have died
with him who had discovered it? What shall we say of agriculture, an
art which requires so much labour and foresight, which is so dependent
on others that it is plain it could only be practised in a society
which had at least begun, and which does not serve so much to draw
the means of subsistence from the earth--for these it would produce
of itself--but to compel it to produce what is most to our taste? But
let us suppose that men had so multiplied that the natural produce of
the earth was no longer sufficient for their support; a supposition,
by the way, which would prove such a life to be very advantageous for
the human race; let us suppose that, without forges or workshops, the
instruments of husbandry had dropped from the sky into the hands of
savages; that they had overcome their natural aversion to continual
labour; that they had learnt so much foresight for their needs; that
they had divined how to cultivate the earth, to sow grain and plant
trees; that they had discovered the arts of grinding corn, and of
setting the grape to ferment--all being things that must have been
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account