The Song of Songs: Translated from the Original Hebrew, with a Commentary, Historical and Critical
Religion
The Song of Songs: Translated from the Original Hebrew, with a Commentary, Historical and Critical
Bible. Song of Solomon -- Commentaries
Let my beloved come, &c. The Shulamite, continuing this beautiful
apostrophe, responds: “If my person really resembles such a paradise,
this garden is yours; yours are all its productions.” פְּרִי מְגָדָיו,
literally the fruit of his deliciousness, i.e. his delicious fruit.
When a compound idea is expressed by one noun followed by another in
the genitive, a suffix which refers to this whole idea is sometimes
appended to the second of the two nouns. Comp. אֱלִילֵי כַּסְפּוֹ, his silver
idols, Isa. ii. 20; Gesen. § 129, b; Ewald, § 291, b; גַן being of a
common gender, the suffix in מְגָדָיו may either refer to garden, or to
beloved; it is more in keeping with the construction to refer it to the
beloved, just as the suffix in גַּנְּוֹ refers to him. The fruit is the
beloved’s because the garden is his, and therefore he may enjoy it.
1. I am coming into my garden, &c. The shepherd, as he embraces his
beloved, expresses his unbounded delight in her charms. The perfect
forms, בָּאתִי שָׁתִיתִי, אָכַלְתִּי, אָרִתִי, are used for the present, Gesen.
§ 126.
Eat, O friends, &c. Some sympathizing court ladies, at a distance,
seeing the mutual happiness of the lovers, urge them to take their fill
of delight. The explanation of Rashbam and others, that this address is
to the companions of the beloved to partake of a friendly meal; or, as
others will have it, that it is an invitation to the marriage feast, is
against the context. The expression אִכְלוּ, eat ye, must be taken in
the same sense as אָכַלְתִי, I eat; and it would be most incongruous to
suppose that the beloved, who enjoys the charms of his loved one, would
call on his friends to do the same. Dr. Geddes, who is followed by Dr.
Good, alters the text into אכל רעי שת ושכיר דודי, Eat, O my friend!
drink, yea, drink abundantly, O my beloved! and puts it into the mouth
of the Shulamite; thus making it an answer to what the beloved said in
the preceding clause. But such conjectural emendations ought to be
repudiated. It is most in accordance with the context to take these
words as an epiphonema of some sympathizing court ladies. The
parallelism and the accents require us to take דוֹדִים as a concrete,
synonymous with רֵעִים, friends; so the Sept., Vulg., Syr., Rashbam,
Ibn Ezra, Rashi, Mendelssohn, &c.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account