The Southern Case for School SegregationKilpatrick, James Jackson
History
The Southern Case for School Segregation
Kilpatrick, James Jackson
African Americans -- Segregation; Segregation -- Southern States
“We conclude,” said the court, “that in the field of public education
the doctrine of ‘separate but equal’ has no place. _Separate
educational facilities are inherently unequal_.” [Emphasis supplied.]
That final sentence contained perhaps the greatest irony of them all,
for unless words have lost their meaning, the court here decreed
equality for the Negro by finding the Negro innately not equal. What
else did the court mean? Here we are told, on the authority of the
most eminent court in the world, that if one-hundred Negro pupils are
put to study in one building, and one-hundred white pupils are put to
study in an identical building, the first group of pupils, who have
been segregated solely on the basis of race, will make up a school
_inherently_ unequal to the other. “Inherently” comes from the Latin
_haerere_, to stick; it means “firmly infixed; belonging by nature.”
And when the court concluded that separate schools for Negroes are
inherently unequal, it made a judicial finding of fact with which a
great many Southerners would find themselves in wry agreement.
That was the substance of the _Brown_ decision. Because of the
predictable impact of the ruling and the great variety of local
conditions, the court asked for reargument on the formulation of
specific decrees. A year later, on May 31, 1955, a supplementary
opinion (this also appears in full in the Appendix) sent the cases
back to the trial courts with instructions to enter decrees ordering
“the parties to these cases admitted to public schools on a racially
nondiscriminatory basis with all deliberate speed.” By that time,
Kansas had abandoned segregation altogether in its schools; so had
the District of Columbia; so had Delaware over much of the State. In
the course of time, Prince Edward County, Virginia, was to abandon
public education rather than submit to compulsory desegregation of
its schools. The public schools of Clarendon County, S. C., are
still operating as I write, in the spring of 1962, as completely
segregated as they were in the spring of 1954. The new Negro schools
are bright and shining and consolidated, and some of the children of
the original plaintiffs of 1951, it is said, are placidly attending
them.
What was wrong with the _Brown_ decision? The Sibley Commission in
Georgia summarized the South’s protest in two sweeping sentences:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account